Разделы презентаций
- Разное
- Английский язык
- Астрономия
- Алгебра
- Биология
- География
- Геометрия
- Детские презентации
- Информатика
- История
- Литература
- Математика
- Медицина
- Менеджмент
- Музыка
- МХК
- Немецкий язык
- ОБЖ
- Обществознание
- Окружающий мир
- Педагогика
- Русский язык
- Технология
- Физика
- Философия
- Химия
- Шаблоны, картинки для презентаций
- Экология
- Экономика
- Юриспруденция
No-Fault Divorce in Canada: Its Cause and Effect
Содержание
- 1. No-Fault Divorce in Canada: Its Cause and Effect
- 2. What It Is All About No-fault divorce presumably
- 3. “Marriage Contract”Inefficient marriages transaction costsNo-fault divorce
- 4. Economic TheoriesMore women in labor force doing
- 5. Hypothesis TestingLabor force participation is the tip
- 6. ConclusionThe introduction of no-fault divorce is a
- 7. Discussion Questions 1/31. No-fault Divorce was first introduced in California
- 8. Discussion Questions 2/33. Do you think the no-fault
- 9. Discussion Questions 3/35. Theoretically, if you were
- 10. Скачать презентанцию
What It Is All About No-fault divorce presumably originated from “inefficient marriages” in 1940-60sAuthor argues this new legislation serves efficiencyFirst ever study on Canadian data (Census)Divorce rates increased since introductionThree segments: 1) Efficient
Слайды и текст этой презентации
Слайд 2What It Is All About
No-fault divorce presumably originated from “inefficient
marriages” in 1940-60s
Author argues this new legislation serves efficiency
First ever
study on Canadian data (Census)Divorce rates increased since introduction
Three segments:
1) Efficient vs Inefficient Marriages
2) Economic theories of divorce
3) Hypothesis Testing (Math)
Слайд 3“Marriage Contract”
Inefficient marriages transaction costs
No-fault divorce good marriages
gone bust
Fault divorce bad marriages kept afloat
Q: What caused
a rise in “inefficient marriages”?A: Several theories:
contraception
feminism, flight from traditional values.
labor force participation starting in WWII (Allen)
Слайд 4Economic Theories
More women in labor force doing more men’s jobs
Variance
in labor type among women
Variance in expectations for future marital
partnerLow gains + expectation shock = divorce
Слайд 5Hypothesis Testing
Labor force participation is the tip of the iceberg
Real
issue = mistakes in partner selection
No-fault divorce is a result,
not a catalystTwo tests:
Relationship b/w no fault divorce and participation (Duration model: )
*Data from StatCan: 1984 Family History Survey
Regression to corroborate results from 1)
*Data from Census
Слайд 6Conclusion
The introduction of no-fault divorce is a response
By-product: efficient and
inefficient divorce
Division into efficient and inefficient explains paradox in judgment
by empirical vs. observation
Слайд 7Discussion Questions 1/3
1. No-fault Divorce was first introduced in California in 1969 but officially
became an option in Canada only in 1986. What are some
factors that have contributed to the delay in your opinion?2. The change in legislation, according to Allen, not only "helped" dissolve inefficient marriages but also induced inefficient divorces (that is, ex-post total wealth is lower than in the marriage union). What other transaction costs can you think of?
Слайд 8Discussion Questions 2/3
3. Do you think the no-fault divorce law encouraged doubting
spouses to divorce or was is rather a liberator for people
that realized they had made a mistake? In your opinion, has this law contributed to a rise in inconsiderate marriage unions nowadays, since spouses bear a lot less risk to be "stuck" with a "wrong person"?4. In no-fault divorce environment there is always a chance that a marriage that should not break up will do so, whereas in a fault divorce case the opposite is true. Do you think that the proportion of good marriages broken up due to this legislation has become statistically significant over the years? Why or why not?
Слайд 9Discussion Questions 3/3
5. Theoretically, if you were married, how would
you decided on the factors determining whether your marriage turned
out efficient of inefficient? What are the main elements, in your opinion?
