Слайд 1Geological and tectonic evolution of the
Arctic Ocean
Course: Particularities and
Features of Cold Region Geology
by
Alexey A. Krylov,
Institute of
Earth Sciences, St. Petersburg State University
Lectures 2 - 3
Слайд 2TOPOGRAPHY OF THE ARCTIC OCEAN
Amundsen Basin
Northwind Ridge
Podvodnikov
Basin
Слайд 3Earthquakes epicenters in Arctic
Слайд 4International Chronosrtatigraphic Chart
Слайд 5What existed prior the Arctic Ocean?
Breakup of Rodinia — the
Grenvillian supercontinent that formed ~1 Ga.
Arctida structures within Rodinia: Svalbard,
the Kara block, the Greenland–Ellesmere, Alaska–Chukchi and New Siberian blocks.
Continental masses
Continental blocks of Arctida
Oceanic basins
Arctida located between the Canadian margin of Laurentia, the southwestern margin of Siberia and the northeastern margin of Baltica.
Слайд 6What existed prior the Arctic Ocean?
Continental masses
Continental blocks of Arctida
Oceanic
basins
The breakup of the Rodinia was accompanied by the destruction
of the margins of plates into independent terranes, microcontinents, small and average plates:
- New Siberian block
- the Kara plate
- Svalbard plates
Active continental margin located close to the Timan–Ural margin of Baltica
Inferred position of spreading zones
Active continental margins
Слайд 7What existed prior the Arctic Ocean?
Continental masses
Continental blocks of Arctida
Oceanic
basins
Inferred position of spreading zones
Active continental margins
Svalbard plate collision -
formation of the Timan–Pechora orogen, which sutured the plate with the timanian margin of Baltica.
The SW margin of Siberia was in a setting of active continental margin of pacific type.
The birth of the Iapetus Ocean on the margins of Laurentia and Baltica.
Слайд 8What existed prior the Arctic Ocean?
Continental masses
Continental blocks of Arctida
Oceanic
basins
Inferred position of spreading zones
Active continental margins
Iapetus was characterized by
an active spreading regime between Laurentia and Baltica.
Continental crust breakup along the eastern (modern coordinates) margin of Baltica with the formation of the oceanic floor of the Ural paleoocean
Слайд 9What existed prior the Arctic Ocean?
Continental masses
Continental blocks of Arctida
Oceanic
basins
Inferred position of spreading zones
Active continental margins
The end
of the Ordovician was marked by the beginning of the closure of the Iapetus oceanic space.
Active subduction processes manifested everywhere on its continental margins
Слайд 10What existed prior the Arctic Ocean?
Continental masses
Continental blocks of Arctida
Oceanic
basins
Inferred position of spreading zones
Active continental margins
The Silurian–Devonian boundary: closure
of the Iapetus Ocean.
The Kara microcontinent already was located directly near the Taimyr margin of Siberia.
The collisional event between Laurentia and Baltica and their unification into Laurussia.
Слайд 11What existed prior the Arctic Ocean?
Continental masses
Continental blocks of Arctida
Oceanic
basins
Inferred position of spreading zones
Active continental margins
The blocks of Arctida
composed a continental bridge between Siberia and Laurussia, joining the structures of the supercontinent.
Rheic Ocean - the oceanic space between Laurentia and the African margin of Gondwana, was in active closure
Слайд 12What existed prior the Arctic Ocean?
Continental masses
Continental blocks of Arctida
Oceanic
basins
Inferred position of spreading zones
Active continental margins
The global tectonic regime
did not undergo any significant alterations in the Early Carboniferous.
Слайд 13What existed prior the Arctic Ocean?
Continental masses
Continental blocks of Arctida
Oceanic
basins
Inferred position of spreading zones
Active continental margins
The Rheic ocean disappeared….
Слайд 14What existed prior the Arctic Ocean?
Continental masses
Continental blocks of Arctida
Oceanic
basins
Inferred position of spreading zones
Active continental margins
The appearance of Pangea…
Arctida….
Слайд 15GEOLOGICAL DATA COLLECTED UP TO DATE
Campanian
Maastrichtian
Maastrichtian
Eocene
?
Only 3 short cores
(Fl 533, CESAR-6, FL 437) on the Alpha Ridge, and
one ACEX-borehole on the Lomonosov Ridge recovered the Mezozoic (Late Cretaceous) sediments. To characterize the Mesozoic sedimentation in the Amerasian Basin, we have only this geological material.
PS87/106
PS87/106
Слайд 16ACEX – Arctic Coring EXpedition – 2004 – IODP302
GEOLOGICAL DATA
COLLECTED UP TO DATE
Слайд 18GEOLOGICAL DATA COLLECTED UP TO DATE
Position of the ACEX-boreholes
on the Lomonosov Ridge drilled along the seismic profile AWI-91090.
Слайд 191
2A
4A
3A
4B
4C
ALL
GEOLOGICAL DATA COLLECTED UP TO DATE
Слайд 20GEOLOGICAL DATA COLLECTED UP TO DATE
TRACKS OF THE VESSELS
Слайд 21ORIGIN OF THE AMERASIAN BASIN
1 – position of idealized boundaries
of modern lithospheric plates;
2 – boundary of the Chukchi –
Arctic Alaska microplate;
3 – idealized trajectory of the Chukchi – Arctic Alaska microplate during the opening of the Canada Basin
Rotational model of the Amerasian Basin Formation
Late Jurassic – Early Cretaceous (~150-140 Ma): breaking off the Chukotka – Arctic Alaska microplate from the Canadian Arctic Archipelago.
Слайд 22ORIGIN OF THE AMERASIAN BASIN
Lobkovsky et al., 2014
P-wave tomogram
90 Ma
Model
of upper mantle return flow: the reason for the extension
of the Makarov-Podvodnikov Basin and separation of the Alpha Mendeleev Ridge from the “paleo-Barents-Kara Sea” margin.
Слайд 23ORIGIN OF THE AMERASIAN BASIN
after Kazmin et al., 2015, Doklady
Earth Sciences
The process of detachment and subsequent movement of the
Alpha-Mendeleev Ridge away from the Barents Sea margin, accompanied by rift extension of the Makarov and Podvodnikov basins, occurred in the interval of 110-60 Ma.
Alpha-
Mendeleev
Ridge
Canada
Basin
Makarov-
Podvodnikov
Basin
Alpha-
Mendeleev
Ridge
Canada
Basin
no Makarov-
Podvodnikov
Basin
Слайд 24The initial area of the Canada Basin 110 Ma ago
was equal to its present area. Later, subsequent formation of
structures of the Amerasian Basin, including the Alpha-Mendeleev Ridge and Makarov and Podvodnikov basins, was caused by continuous movement of the subduction zone, located on the Alaska-Chukchi margin, toward the Pacific.
ORIGIN OF THE AMERASIAN BASIN
Alpha-
Mendeleev
Ridge
Canada
Basin
Makarov-
Podvodnikov
Basin
“Lomonosov
Ridge”
Слайд 25AMERASIAN BASIN: MESOZOIC SEDIMENTS
Clark, 1988
Fl-437, CESAR-6
Warm Arctic Ocean with strong
seasonality and high paleoproductivity.
Yellowish laminated siliceous ooze rich in diatoms,
ebrideans, silicoflagellates, and archeomonads. OC < 1%.
Age: Campanian for Fl-437 (Dell’Agnese&Clark, 1994);
Campanian-Maastrichtian for CESAR-6, depending on whether diatoms, silicoflagellates or palinomorphs are taken as the prime biostratographic indicator.
Слайд 26Fl-533
Peridinoid and gonyaulocoid cysts – dinoflagellate
Age: early Maastrichtian (Fifth&Clark, 1998)
Immature,
mixed terrigenous-marine type of organic matter.
Origin: anoxic condition in an
isolated local basin? A depositional environment under an oceanic water mass exibiting an oxygen minimum?
AMERASIAN BASIN: MESOZOIC SEDIMENTS
Слайд 27Jenkyns et al., 2004
AMERASIAN BASIN: MESOZOIC TEMPERATURES
Слайд 28ARCTIC OCEAN: FORMATION OF THE EURASIAN BASIN
Lobkovsky et al., 2014
Detachment
of “the second zone of Cenozoic tectonic blocks” (a linear
Lomonosov Basins Ridge) from the Barents Sea margin and formation of the Eurasian Basin.
55 Ma
Слайд 29PALEOGENE – GREENHOUSE
Sluijs et al., Nature Geo, 2009
Thermal events during
Paleogene coincided with intervals where Corg depleted in 13C isotope.
Reason: gas hydrate destabilization? (CH4 depleted in 13C)
Слайд 30PALEOCENE–EOCENE THERMAL MAXIMUM (PETM)
Late Paleocene – Early Eocene
Sluijs et al.,
2006
TEX86 temperatures in the Central Arctic during (and around) PETM.
Слайд 31AZOLLA FRESHWATER EVENT – MIDDLE EOCENE
0
1 2 3
4 5 6, TOC%
Слайд 32AZOLLA FRESHWATER EVENT – MIDDLE EOCENE
Age of Azolla event
in ACEX core was determined by calibration with well-dated ODP
hole 913B = 48.3 Myr.
Слайд 33PALEOGENE: ISOLATION OF THE ARCTIC OCEAN
50 Ma
40 Ma
Barron et al.,
2015
Closing of the Turgai Strait. The Arctic Ocean become isolated.
Слайд 34BIOSILICA DEPOSITS – MIDDLE EOCENE
Biosilica sediments in the Lithological
Units 2 and 1/6 of the ACEX.
Слайд 35BIOSILICA DEPOSITS – MIDDLE EOCENE
Слайд 361/3
1/4
1/6
2
1/3
1/4
1/6
2
Marine anoxic environments is needed
BIOSILICA DEPOSITS – MIDDLE EOCENE
Pyrite
in heavy fraction (size 0.05-0.1 mm) from ACEX sediments
Biosilica
Sandy silty
clay
Paleogene
Neogene
Слайд 37BIOSILICA DEPOSITS – MIDDLE EOCENE
Environmental model of the central
Arctic at the Lomonosov Ridge during the early middle Eocene,
after the Azolla phase.
Слайд 38PROBLEM OF THE MID-CENOZOIC HIATUS
Silty Clay
Biosilicious
ooze
Silty clay
Age model “A” includes
26 Ma hiatus at ~200 m below ocean floor.
Mesozoic
Paleogene
Neogene
Слайд 39Moore et al., 2006.
SUBSIDENCE OF THE LOMONOSOV RIDGE
The regular
subsidence of the Lomonosov Ridge by cooling and weighting of
the lithosphere with time: a consequence from plate tectonics.
Right side: lithological units from U4 (oldest) to U1.2 (youngest)
Слайд 40PROBLEM OF THE MID-CENOZOIC HIATUS
Evidence against a long hiatus: the
absence of faults and tectonic deformations in the sediments above
the intended hiatus on the Lomonosov Ridge.
Слайд 41Poirier, Hillaire-Marcel, GRL, 2011
ПРОБЛЕМА СРЕДНЕ-КАЙНОЗОЙСКОГО ПЕРЕРЫВА
PROBLEM OF THE MID-CENOZOIC HIATUS
The
values of osmium isotopes in the sediments accumulated "before hiatus"
is different from those in the World Oceans, which confirms the isolation of the Arctic.
The values of osmium isotopes also indicate the absence of a long hiatus (less than 400 thousand years, not 26 million!).
Слайд 42ПРОБЛЕМА СРЕДНЕ-КАЙНОЗОЙСКОГО ПЕРЕРЫВА
PROBLEM OF THE MID-CENOZOIC HIATUS
If " age model
B" is true, then the sedimentary section contains Oligocene deposits.
Слайд 43Hegewald, Jokat, 2013
Fram Strait open ~17.5 Ma [Jakobsson et al.,
2007]
Isolation of the Arctic Ocean till this time [O’Regan
et al., 2008]
New idea: isolation from ~49 Ma (Turgai Strait closing) till 36.2 Ma [Chernykh, Krylov, 2015].
Oligocene regression (ruppelian/chattian) can be observed in the sediments of the Central Arctic Ocean
ПРОБЛЕМА СРЕДНЕ-КАЙНОЗОЙСКОГО ПЕРЕРЫВА
PROBLEM OF THE MID-CENOZOIC HIATUS
Isolation: 49÷36.6 Ма
Слайд 44MODEL
Dropping of the sea level due to spreading in the
Eurasian Basin during isolation of the Arctic Ocean
subsidence model of
[Moore et al.,2006]
ПРОБЛЕМА СРЕДНЕ-КАЙНОЗОЙСКОГО ПЕРЕРЫВА
PROBLEM OF THE MID-CENOZOIC HIATUS
Falling sea levels could lead to erosion of sediments on the Lomonosov Ridge. Most likely this erosion does not exceed 400 Kyr.
Слайд 45ONSET OF SEASONAL AND PERRENIAL ICE
Jenkuns et al., 2004, Nature
The
assumption about the time of sea-ice occurrence in the Central
Arctic prior ACEX drilling.
Слайд 46Stickley et al., 2009, Nature
St. John, 2008, Paleoceanography
ONSET OF SEASONAL
AND PERRENIAL ICE
Onset of the ice in Central Arctic: appearance
of the coarse material (IRD) and ice-dependent diatoms.
Слайд 47Неокатанные
Плохо
окатанные
Полуокатанные
Хорошо
окатанные
Wadell coefficients
First appearance of the stones at the
247 mbsf, in LU 2 (biosilica deposits) = 46 Ma
(or at 43 Ma using stratigraphy “without hiatus”)
Amount of fraction 150-250 μm increased at 46.3 Ma. [St. John, 2008].
Sea-ice-related diatoms Synedropsis spp. found ~47 Ma [Stickley et al., 2009].
First seasonal ice appeared in the Central Arctic in the Middle Eocene
ONSET OF SEASONAL AND PERRENIAL ICE
Слайд 48ONSET OF SEASONAL AND PERRENIAL ICE
Alkenone-based sea surface temperatues (SSToC),
abundance of ice-rafted debris (IRD). SST data do not support
perennial sea ice cover during the studied time interval.
- occurrence of large-sized single dropstones
Major
cooling
events
Major
warming
event
Major increases in sea-ice cover
EOCENE
Слайд 49Sources of the terrigenous material and ice drift systems
ONSET OF
SEASONAL AND PERRENIAL ICE
Px – Clinopyroxene;
Hbl – Hornblende;
Sid – Siderite;
P
– Pyrite;
D – Dolomite;
Chl – Chloritoid;
I – illite;
S – smectite;
K – kaolinite;
C - chlorite
Numbers: time during which the ice reaches the Fram Strait
Слайд 50ONSET OF SEASONAL AND PERRENIAL ICE
Distribution of the heavy minerals
along the ACEX borehole. Сhange of the mineral associations occurred
at ~ 13Ma.
Paleogene
Neogene
13Ma
Слайд 51 Large-sized stones in LUs 2, 1/6, 1/5 и 1/4 represented
by quartz sandstones, quartz siltstones and quartzites.
Within LUs 1/3
– 1/1 also appear argillites (shales), schists, flints, limestone (1 sample) and basalts (2 samples).
Сhange of rocks assemblages found at the level of 159 m, which practically coincides with the change of associations of heavy minerals in LU 1/3.
1/2
1/3
1/4
1/6
2
0
100
200
300
mbsf
Qu sandstone
Qu sandstone
Quartzite
Quartzite
Qu sandstone - 3
Quartzite - 2
Quartz sandstone - 1
Dolerite - 1
Qu sandstone - 3
Sandstone - 9
Shale - 7
Qu gravelstone - 3
Sandstone - 2
Basalt - 2
Flint, Qu sandstone, Limestone, Shale
ONSET OF SEASONAL AND PERRENIAL ICE
Cpx/
Hbl
Слайд 52The first pack ice in the central Arctic have appeared
in the Middle Miocene (about 13 Ma). From that moment,
the “paleo-trans-polar" ice drift system began to act.
ONSET OF SEASONAL AND PERRENIAL ICE
Слайд 53QUATERNARY SEDIMENTATION IN THE ARCTIC
Three scenarios of sedimentation
Glaciation.
The ocean
is covered with pack ice. Lack of benthic and planktonic
organisms. Sedimentation rates are minimal.
2) Deglaciation.
Degradation of glaciers. The appearance of a large number of icebergs. The transfer of coarse material. Pack ice and icebergs are melting rapidly. The appearance of benthic and planktonic organisms. High rates of sedimentation.
3) Interglacial.
Modern Arctic Ocean. The predominance of clay and silt material. The abundance of benthic and planktonic organisms. The intermediate sedimentation rates.
Слайд 54QUATERNARY SEDIMENTATION IN THE ARCTIC
Pack ice
Glaciation
Glacier
Low sedimentation rates or hiatus
turbidites
Слайд 55QUATERNARY SEDIMENTATION IN THE ARCTIC
Glacier
Pack ice
Deglaciation
icebergs
turbidites
IRD
IRD
IRD – ice-rafted debris
High sedimentation
rates
IRD
Start of bioproductivity
Seasonal
ice
Pelagic
sedimentation
Слайд 56QUATERNARY SEDIMENTATION IN THE ARCTIC
Glacier
turbidites
IRD
Pack ice
IRD
High bioproductivity
Seasonal ice
Pelagic
sedimentation
Interglacial
High or
intermediate
sedimentation rates
Слайд 57Contribution of glaciomarine material to pelagic sediments
Слайд 58Contribution of glaciomarine material to pelagic sediments
Слайд 59Contribution of glaciomarine material to pelagic sediments
Слайд 60Contribution of glaciomarine material to pelagic sediments
Слайд 61Contribution of glaciomarine material to pelagic sediments
Слайд 62Contribution of glaciomarine material to pelagic sediments
Ice-Rafted Debris.
Rounded quartz grains
from ice-rafted debris
An angular quartz grain from ice-rafted sediment
A sample
of ice-rafted debris (IRD), or sediment.
The individual grains of microscopic-size debris are counted to obtain the percentage of grains in a gram of sediment.
The percentage varies when ice-rafting increases or decreases, or if the number of organisms increase or decrease.
Слайд 63Quantitative studies of glaciomarine-influenced sediments from the Nordic seas have
shown that their IRD content can be correlated to the
onshore glacial history of the Fennoscandian and the Svalbard/Barents Sea ice sheets.
Large amounts of IRD in the sediments coincide with the extension of the ice sheets over the continental shelves.
Contribution of glaciomarine material to pelagic sediments
Слайд 64Marine Isotopic Stages
Marine Isotope Stages (MIS), sometimes referred to as
Oxygen Isotope Stages (OIS), are related to chronological alternating of
cold and warm periods on our planet, going back to at ~ 2.6 Ma.
MIS uses the balance of oxygen isotopes in stacked fossil plankton (foraminifera) deposits on the bottom of the oceans to build an environmental history of our planet.
The changing oxygen isotope ratios hold information about the presence of ice sheets, and thus planetary climate changes, on our earth's surface.
Слайд 66 As a result of experiments that compared the real temperature
of foraminifera growth with the calculated "isotopic temperatures", the following
equation was derived (Erez & Luz, 1983).
ToC = 17.0 – 4.52 (δ18Oc – δ18Ow) + 0.03 (δ18Oc – – δ18Ow)2,
Marine Isotopic Stages
where
δ18Ос – О-isotope from carbonate-CO2 and
δ18Оw – О-isotope from СО2, which is in equilibrium with water at 25оС.
δ18О = 18O/16O
Слайд 68QUATERNARY SEDIMENTATION IN THE ARCTIC
Grain-size
Inclination
Foramenifers
Гранулометрия
Grain-size
Inclination
Inclination
Foraminifers
Фораминиферы
Слайд 69OIL&GAS POTENTIAL OF THE CENTRAL ARCTIC
Hydrocarbons were discoveried in Arctic:
These
discoveries demonstrate that favourable conditions for hydrocarbon generation and entrapment
are widespread in the Arctic Ocean region
- along the Arctic Alaskan margins (Mackenzie Delta–Prudhoe Bay),
- the Canadian Arctic Islands (Sverdrup–Ellesmere Basin), and
- on the Eurasian shelves (southern Barents Sea, western Siberia).
The primary source of these oil and gas accumulations is thought to be source-rock units of Pz and Mz age.
Слайд 70OIL&GAS POTENTIAL OF THE CENTRAL ARCTIC
In contrast, Tertiary oils in
the Beaufort Mackenzie basin off northwestern Canada appear to be
derived from organic-rich, middle-upper Eocene deposits (Richards Sequence).
Слайд 71A new assessment of the hydrocarbon resources along the Arctic
Alaskan margin suggests that Eocene and Miocene sequences have given
rise to previously unrecognized petroleum systems.
A potential source-rock unit might be the organic-rich, lower Eocene section of the Canning Formation (Mikkelsen Tongue) which has organic carbon contents typically 1-2 wt% and max values up to 12.3 wt%.
OIL&GAS POTENTIAL OF THE CENTRAL ARCTIC
Слайд 72OIL&GAS POTENTIAL OF THE CENTRAL ARCTIC
Recent recovery of organic-rich, lower-middle
Eocene sediments from the Lomonosov Ridge by the IODP302 Expedition,
coupled with evidence from organic-rich Eocene deposits on the New Siberian Islands (Kos’ko and Trufanov, 2002), has given rise to speculations that widespread, organic-rich, potential source rocks might be present across the entire Arctic Basin and its margins (Durham, 2007).
These strata are characterised by the widespread occurrence of large quantities of the freshwater fern Azolla deposited during the onset of the middle Eocene (about 50 Ma).
Yellow asterisks = Azolla locations
Слайд 73OIL&GAS POTENTIAL OF THE CENTRAL ARCTIC
Simulated variation in TOC content
(wt%) and HI (mg HC/g TOC) between 56.2 and 44.4
Ma along the Lomonosov Ridge transect
Слайд 74OIL&GAS POTENTIAL OF THE CENTRAL ARCTIC
Source-rock potential classes based on
HI and TOC values (Peters, 1986)
Modelled source-rock potential in the
Lomonosov Ridge borehole (IODP-302)
Слайд 75OIL&GAS POTENTIAL OF THE CENTRAL ARCTIC
Simulated source-rock potential in sediments
deposited between 56.2 and 44.4 Ma along the Lomonosov Ridge
and corresponding overburden thickness (in metres).
Potential is better in the Amundsen Basin direction.
Слайд 76OIL&GAS POTENTIAL OF THE CENTRAL ARCTIC
1D thermal and burial history
modeling for IODP-302 borehole (Mann et al., 2009).
Model shows
that an additional 1000 m overburden and a constant heat flow of 100 mW m2 are required to initiate HC generation.
Слайд 77OIL&GAS POTENTIAL OF THE CENTRAL ARCTIC
Accumulated thickness of rocks having
very good and good HC source potential on the Lomonosov
Ridge (max. 110 m) and in the Amundsen Basin (up to 250 m) plotted against their respective seismic profiles (Mann et al. 2009).
Слайд 78CONCLUSION
1) Canadian Basin began to form in the Late Jurassic
– Early Cretaceous (~150-140 Ma) due to breaking off the
Chukotka–Arctic Alaska microplate from the Canadian Arctic Archipelago.
2) The process of detachment and subsequent movement of the Alpha-Mendeleev Ridge away from the Barents Sea margin, accompanied by rift extension of the Makarov and Podvodnikov basins, occurred in the interval of 110-60 Ma.
3) Mesozoic sediments in the Amerasian Basin represented mainly by siliceous («diatom-bearing”) sediments.
4) Detachment of the Lomonosov Ridge from the Barents Sea margin and formation of the Eurasian Basin began ~58 Ma (Late Paleocene).
Слайд 795) Two age models (“A” and “B”) may be used
for the characterization of ACEX sediment. Age model “A” includes
a 26 My-long hiatus (covering the Oligocene, Eocene and Late Early Miocene). Model “B” includes a hiatus of less than 400 Ky. Model “B” seems more reliable from the standpoint of plate tectonics. In favor of a short hiatus indicates the absence of significant erosion of sediment, confirmed by a detailed analysis of the dropstones and heavy minerals distribution.
CONCLUSION
6) During the late Paleocene-early Eocene terrigenous shelf sediments accumulated on the Lomonosov Ridge (and in the Eurasian Basin): LU3 in the ACEX-well. Accumulation of bio-siliceous sediments began in the Middle Eocene: LU2-1/6 in the ACEX-well. For a long time the Arctic Ocean was an isolated basin.
Слайд 80CONCLUSION
8) The first seasonal ices appeared in the central Arctic
in the Middle Eocene and the further evolution of the
Arctic basin was accompanied by a gradual cooling of the climate.
7) In the Late Eocene (36.6 Ma) Fram Strait opened and the isolation of the Arctic Ocean terminated. Pelagic terrigenous sediments of lithological units 1/6 - 1/1 began to accumulate.
9) The first pack ice in the central Arctic have appeared in the Middle Miocene (about 13 Ma). From that moment, trans-polar drift ice system began working.
Слайд 81CONCLUSION
10) Sources of sedimentary material that is carried by ice
(icebergs) was fairly stable in geological history. For the Eurasian
basin this is a mainly "Siberian sources", and for Amerasian basin - "Canadian.“ This indicates the general (large-scale) stability of the basic systems of modern ice drift (trans-Polar and the Beaufort gyre) in the geological past.