S.SEIFULLIN KAZAKH AGRO TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY (2708)

of Science Lecturer: Ainur Abdina - Doctor of philosophical sciences, Associate

Professor of Department of Philosophy

Astana 2018

post-nonclassical stage of history and philosophy of science




The

purpose of the lecture: a critical analysis of the basic concepts of post-nonclassical stage of scientific development

Have Never Been Modern”

of the world
The ambivalence of human existence

proclaims the absence of universal criteria of truth of knowledge,

and the imposition of such criteria, the state or society is considered as an obstacle to the free development of science.

all.
Feyerabend does not admit the existence of any criteria

for comparison of theories or point in time when they can be compared. According to him, micro revolution in science are constant, namely, when some brave scientist decided to move away from the old proven methods of scientific research or theory creates absolutely not compatible with the old, and opening up new horizons of knowledge.

one can distinguish the true from the false knowledge or

to find out which of the theories is better or worse. Feyerabend concludes that it is impossible to claim that scientific knowledge is better and more informed than religious or mythological. They are equal to each other ways of understanding reality, and reject some of them will be a loss, and not the acquisition.

is to adhere to - it is the principle «anything

goes».
Scientist can conduct propaganda of their views by any means.

state. According to him, standardized education, as well as some

taken for public research institutions beliefs, scientific dogma imposed on the people working in this area, leading to stagnation in science, drive it to the narrow limits.

of the relation of postmodernism and modern science.
Postmodernism uses

categories of uncertainty, imminence, multi-variant.
Pluralistic nature of the world and the ambivalence of human existence.

remains as a research subject (independent of man and his

activities?)
The problem of truth - whether science strives to achieve it?
The problem of the objectivity of knowledge - whether the objectivity of scientific knowledge by meeting the subject matter?

process of social construction of the result?
Problem of history

- the extent to which new knowledge is generated from old, from history?
The problem of logical relations in philosophy.

of power relations.

Never Been Modern” (1997).
Where does faith in science? Maybe science

it's just a specific branch of the policy? Academic institutions around the world are working to stop. The juxtaposition of Sciences and Arts is out of date. Formal academic specialization rarely coincides with its actual performance.

of searching for the truth - the order and report.

Or maybe neither truth nor eternity never was? Where are we in this case bears?

«We Have Never Been Modern»? Maybe, just once, and there

was a long time there was a certain paradigm of ideas that now does not change arbitrarily (as sadly notes postmodernism), and under the pressure of the changed reality?

online, robot cleaner and laboratory cloning, but where there is

no anthropological fault between white people and everyone else. Where social and gender identity - it is a matter of choice. Reality this does not mean that tomorrow will be much clearer, stronger and "cleaner" meaning. She is no longer needed.

a result, incoherent and disparate situations start to communicate and

compared with each other.
This is no exposure of the poor quality of science. On the contrary, it means that we understand how it is formed knowledge.

do not lose what is, to review what is in

doubt, provide a place that will. No quackery, but a sober assessment of strategies to achieve consensus. That, in fact, is engaged the sociology of knowledge. It offers its own Constitution, a system of common rules by which knowledge functions.

nature and culture and the transcendent God who performs the

arbitration function. In our modern times, and the objective nature of the free, that subordinate unified law, society co-exist together, and the time flow is not uniform. No power cannot subdue him.