Разделы презентаций


Grammar as the backbone of language

Содержание

Lecture outlineGrammar as a design feature of human language.The term ‘grammar’ and its etymology.Practical vs. theoretical grammar.Grammar: the historical background.The notions of modern linguistics/grammar.

Слайды и текст этой презентации

Слайд 1Grammar as the backbone of language
Lecture 1

Grammar as the backbone of languageLecture 1

Слайд 2Lecture outline
Grammar as a design feature of human language.
The term

‘grammar’ and its etymology.
Practical vs. theoretical grammar.
Grammar: the historical background.
The

notions of modern linguistics/grammar.

Lecture outlineGrammar as a design feature of human language.The term ‘grammar’ and its etymology.Practical vs. theoretical grammar.Grammar:

Слайд 3Linguistics

is the scientific study of human language.

Language is difficult

to define (different perspective can be taken; it is a

‘system of systems’).

Linguisticsis the scientific study of human language. Language is difficult to define (different perspective can be taken;

Слайд 4The most common definition
Language is the vehicle for

the expression or exchanging of thoughts, concepts, knowledge, and information

as well as the fixing and transmission of experience and knowledge.
The most common definition  Language is the vehicle for the expression or exchanging of thoughts, concepts,

Слайд 5Different perspectives on language
Language is the linguistic competence of

a speaker. His ability to produce sentences, depending on his/her

communicative needs (generative or dynamic understanding of language).

Different perspectives on language Language is the linguistic competence of a speaker. His ability to produce sentences,

Слайд 6Different perspectives on language
Language is a specific system

of signs (phonemes, morphemes, lexemes) and combinatory rules, which are

arbitrary but passed on as conventions (F. de Saussure, structuralism).

Different perspectives on language  Language is a specific system of signs (phonemes, morphemes, lexemes) and combinatory

Слайд 7The system of systems
the phonological system (the sounds),
the

lexical system (the words),
and the grammatical system (the set

of regularities).

The system of systems the phonological system (the sounds), the lexical system (the words), and the grammatical

Слайд 8Different units – different fields
Grammar can be defined

as one of the fields in linguistics, which deals with

the grammatical system of language (грамматический строй языка).
Different units – different fields  Grammar can be defined as one of the fields in linguistics,

Слайд 9The grammatical system
The grammatical system is the whole set

of regularities determining the combination of naming means in the

formation of utterances as the embodiment of thinking process;
a system of means used to turn linguistic units into communicative ones: the units of language into the units of speech.
The grammatical system The grammatical system is the whole set of regularities determining the combination of naming

Слайд 10Morphology + Syntax = Grammar
Grammar is

the study of the grammatical system, which is a set

of regulations determining the ways of changing words (morphology) and the ways they combine into word-groups or sentences (syntax).

Morphology + Syntax = Grammar    Grammar is the study of the grammatical system, which

Слайд 11Morphology and Syntax
Morpphology deals with morphemes, the internal structure of

words, peculiarities of their grammatical categories and their semantics.


Traditional syntax

deals with the rules governing the way words are combined into sentences.

Morphology and SyntaxMorpphology deals with morphemes, the internal structure of words, peculiarities of their grammatical categories and

Слайд 12Different approaches to the study of linguistic units
as the elements

of a particular language or across languages (Grammar in general

vs. the grammar of a particular language);

descriptively vs. prescriptively (be vs. must be grammar);

synchronically vs. diachronically (at a particular period of time vs. in development overtime);

theoretically vs. practically.

Different approaches to the study of linguistic unitsas the elements of a particular language or across languages

Слайд 13Practical vs. theoretical grammar
Practical: providing the student with a manual

of practical mastery of the corresponding part of language.

The aim

of theoretical grammar of a language is to scientifically analyse and define its grammatical categories and study the mechanisms of grammatical formation of utterances out of words in the process of speech making.

Practical vs. theoretical grammarPractical: providing the student with a manual of practical mastery of the corresponding part

Слайд 14The importance of the study of grammar
The uniqueness of

the human language: human language vs. animal language.
Design or

unique features of language, which are numerous.
The importance of the study of grammar The uniqueness of the human language: human language vs. animal

Слайд 15The unique features of language
“Language is the most human of

all human attributes. More than just a means of communication,

it is our vehicle of thought. We cannot imagine human beings without language, and if we came across another creature with language in our sense we would say it was human or human-like, or intelligent in the way that humans are. Language influences every sphere of human activity, including all the sciences, from physics through sociology to literary criticism”.

The unique features of language“Language is the most human of all human attributes. More than just a

Слайд 16The unique features of language
vocal-auditory channel (vs. gesture systems);
arbitrariness (no

connection between the sign and the object of reality);
prevarication (being

able to lie);
learnability ( learning more than one language).



The unique features of languagevocal-auditory channel (vs. gesture systems);arbitrariness (no connection between the sign and the object

Слайд 17The most impressive feature
duality of patterning (the use of a

small number of meaningless elements (phonemes) in combination to produce

a large number of meaningful elements (words, sentences), which is GRAMMAR!

Grammar is the backbone of a language!

A man is homo grammaticus!

The most impressive featureduality of patterning (the use of a small number of meaningless elements (phonemes) in

Слайд 18The historical perspective
The term ‘grammar’ comes from the Greek word

grammatikē,
‘gramma’ meant ‘letter’ and was derived from the stem which

originally was interpreted as ‘to draw or write’,
tikē’ (from technē) meant ‘art’.
Literally, Grammatikē is the art of writing.
Generally, both philology and literature in the broadest sense.

"
The historical perspectiveThe term ‘grammar’ comes from the Greek word grammatikē,‘gramma’ meant ‘letter’ and was derived from

Слайд 19 Traditional Grammar in Ancient Greece and Rome: prescriprive (pre-scientific)

Dionysius Thrax, Protagoras,

Plato, Aristotle, Varro, and Priscian.

Dionysius Thrax (c. 100 B.C.): the

sentence (logos) and the word as the units of grammatical description.
Traditional Grammar in Ancient Greece

Слайд 20D. Thrax
The sentence is understood as “expressing a complete thought”.


The classes of words: noun class words (nouns and adjective),

verbs, particles, articles, pronouns, preposition, adverbs, conjunctions; as well as their categories.
For the nouns he distinguishes: 1) Génos (gender): masculine, feminine, neuter; 2) Eīdos (type): primary or derived; 3) Schēma (form): simple or compound; 4) Arithmós (number): singular, dual, or plural; 5) Ptōsis (case): nominative, vocative, objective, genitive, dative.
D. ThraxThe sentence is understood as “expressing a complete thought”. The classes of words: noun class words

Слайд 21Traditional Grammar in Ancient Rome
Roman linguistics was largely based on

the Greek tradition.
Varro: derivation vs. inflection.
Priscian: omits articles,

include the interjection.

Having borrowed its foundations from the Greek tradition, for centuries Latin grammar was seen as the basis for other languages.

Traditional Grammar in Ancient Rome Roman linguistics was largely based on the Greek tradition. Varro: derivation vs.

Слайд 22Middle Ages: prescriptive grammars
Latin grammars for English-speakers;
teaching Englishmen to

read, write and sometimes converse in the lingua franca of

Western Europe, Latin.

Middle Ages: prescriptive grammarsLatin grammars for English-speakers; teaching Englishmen to read, write and sometimes converse in the

Слайд 23The Renaissance
Interest in modern languages;
admiration for Ancient culture (Greek and

Latin).

Grammars of modern languages (English), based on and oriented at

Latin.
The Renaissance Interest in modern languages;admiration for Ancient culture (Greek and Latin).Grammars of modern languages (English), based

Слайд 24Lowth’s Short Introduction to English Grammar (1762)
“to teach us to

express ourselves with propriety... and to enable us to judge

of every phrase and form of construction, whether it be right or not”.
The criterion – LATIN!
Nouns were described as follows:
Nominative: the house
Genitive: of the house
Dative: to the house
Accusative: the house
Ablative: in, at, from the house
Vocative: house

Lowth’s Short Introduction to English Grammar (1762)“to teach us to express ourselves with propriety... and to enable

Слайд 25Prescriptive grammars
Patterning after Latin in classifying words into word classes

and establishing grammatical categories;
Reliance on meaning and function in definitions;
The

standards of correctness are logic, which was identified with Latin, and the past;
Emphasis on writing rather than speech.

Prescriptive grammarsPatterning after Latin in classifying words into word classes and establishing grammatical categories;Reliance on meaning and

Слайд 26Non-Structural Descriptive Grammar
In the second half of the 19th c.:

the need for a scientific explanation of the actually occurring

structures without assessing their correctness.

Henry Sweet’s New English Grammar, Logical and Historical (1891): “.. the statement of facts, without attempting to settle their relative correctness <…> If an ‘ungrammatical’ expression is in general use among educated people, I accept it as such, simply adding that it is avoided in the literary language” (H. Sweet, 1891: XI).

Non-Structural Descriptive Grammar In the second half of the 19th c.: the need for a scientific explanation

Слайд 27Non-Structural Descriptive Grammar in Summary
actual usage without evaluating;

change

in language is not associated with corruption.

Non-Structural Descriptive Grammar in Summary  actual usage without evaluating; change in language is not associated with

Слайд 28Structural Descriptive Grammar
The 20s of the 20th c. are considered

to be the birth of MODERN linguistics; structuralism.

Europe: F. de

Saussure (a Swiss linguist; his lectures which were published in 1915 by his followers, The Course in General Linguistics).

In the US, Leonard Bloomfield, his book Language: “The study of language can be conducted... only so long as we pay no attention to the meaning of what is spoken”.

Structural Descriptive Grammar The 20s of the 20th c. are considered to be the birth of MODERN

Слайд 29American Structuralism
English was regarded as a language having its specific

structure.

The structure of a language can be revealed by using

scientific (i.e. formal) methods of analysis.

Language is a highly organized affair, where the smaller units are built into larger units, which in turn are built into larger ones, until the largest unit is reached.

Meaning was ignored because it was not observable.
American StructuralismEnglish was regarded as a language having its specific structure.The structure of a language can be

Слайд 30Immediate constituents analysis (IC analysis)

Immediate constituents analysis  (IC analysis)

Слайд 31The transformational method
Zellig Harris (the 1950s); to reveal similarities and

differences in the structure of the units.
1) Mary has a

new car. vs. 2) Mary has a good time.
Mary has a new car. _ *A new car is had by Mary.
Mary has a good time._ A good time is had by Mary.

If linguistic units cannot be subjected to the same transformation, their structure is different.
The transformational methodZellig Harris (the 1950s); to reveal similarities and differences in the structure of the units.1)

Слайд 32 European Structuralism: the basic notions of modern linguistics
F. de

Saussure: a language should be regarded as a structured system

of elements, in which the place of each element is defined chiefly by how it relates to other elements.
European Structuralism: the basic notions of modern linguistics  F. de Saussure: a language should be

Слайд 33Saussure’s ideas
Language is a system of signals (linguistic signs), interconnected

and interdependent.
Language may be compared to other systems of

signals, such as writing, alphabets for the deaf-and-dumb, military signals, symbolic rites, forms of courtesy, etc.
Language is the object of a more general science, semiology (semiotics, the study of signs).
Saussure’s ideasLanguage is a system of signals (linguistic signs), interconnected and interdependent. Language may be compared to

Слайд 34Saussure’s ideas
System vs. structure:
Language is regarded as a system of

elements (or: signs, units) such as sounds, words, etc.
These

elements have no value without each other, they depend on each other, they exist only in a system, and they are nothing without a system.
System implies the characterization of a complex object as made up of separate parts (e.g. the system of sounds).
Language is a structural system. Structure means hierarchical layering of parts in 'constituting’ the whole.


Saussure’s ideasSystem vs. structure:Language is regarded as a system of elements (or: signs, units) such as sounds,

Слайд 35The structure of language
The segmental units of language form
a

hierarchy of levels:
The lowest level of lingual segments is phonemic

(the phoneme).
The morphemic level (the morpheme).
The lexemic level (the word).
The phrasemic level (the word-group).
The level of sentences, or "proposemic" level (the sentence).
The supra-proposemic (a sentence group, forming textual unity).
The structure of languageThe segmental units of language form a hierarchy of levels:The lowest level of lingual

Слайд 36the signified vs. the signifier the content side vs. the expression

side
A linguistic unit (sign) is a bilateral element

possessing both a directly observable material structure and directly unobservable content or meaning. The two elements are intimately united and each recalls the other. Accordingly, we distinguish the content side and the expression side.

the signified vs. the signifier the content side vs. the expression side  A linguistic unit (sign)

Слайд 37Language vs. speech
Language is a collective body of knowledge, it

is a set of basic elements, but these elements can

form a great variety of combinations.
Speech is the result of using the language, the result of a definite act of speaking.

Speech is individual, personal while language is common for all individuals.

Grammar dynamically connects language with speech, because it determines the lingual process of utterance production.
Language vs. speech Language is a collective body of knowledge, it is a set of basic elements,

Слайд 38Syntagmatic vs. paradigmatic relations
Syntagmatic relations are immediate linear relations between

units in a segmental sequence (string); relations "in praesentia" (observed).

Paradigmatic

relations exist between elements of the system outside the strings where they co-occur; each lingual unit is included in a set or series of connections based on different formal and functional properties; relations "in absentia"" cannot be observed in a line).

Syntagmatic vs. paradigmatic relationsSyntagmatic relations are immediate linear relations between units in a segmental sequence (string); relations

Слайд 39Synchrony vs. diachrony
A synchronic approach to language is the study

of language at a particular period of time, ignoring the

numerous historical factors and influences which led to that state.

A diachronic approach is historical, it studies the development of language overtime.

Synchrony vs. diachronyA synchronic approach to language is the study of language at a particular period of

Слайд 40According to Saussure:
Linguistics is the study of language (not

speech);
It is synchronic;
It must be concentrated on the units of

language and relations between them.

According to Saussure: Linguistics is the study of language (not speech);It is synchronic;It must be concentrated on

Слайд 41Conclusion
The ideas introduced by de Saussure are still of great

importance.
Linguistics, as well as grammar, is developing and broadening its

horizons (new fields).
Grammar is the study of the grammatical system of language.
The grammatical system of language can be seen from different perspectives.
ConclusionThe ideas introduced by de Saussure are still of great importance.Linguistics, as well as grammar, is developing

Обратная связь

Если не удалось найти и скачать доклад-презентацию, Вы можете заказать его на нашем сайте. Мы постараемся найти нужный Вам материал и отправим по электронной почте. Не стесняйтесь обращаться к нам, если у вас возникли вопросы или пожелания:

Email: Нажмите что бы посмотреть 

Что такое TheSlide.ru?

Это сайт презентации, докладов, проектов в PowerPoint. Здесь удобно  хранить и делиться своими презентациями с другими пользователями.


Для правообладателей

Яндекс.Метрика