CRIMEAN FEDRAL UNIVERCITY NAMED AFER V.I.VERNADSKY MEDICAL ACADEMY NAMED AFER

MEDICAL

ACADEMY NAMED AFER S.I.GEODIEVSKY

JEAN BATISTE LAMARK-CREATOR OF THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY

BY: THOMAS GNANA SELVAN
GROUP: 191 B
TEACHER:PHD.SVELANA SMIRNOVA

evolutionary process
Influence of external environment

des animaux sans vertèbres, a major work on the classification

of invertebrates, a term he coined. In an 1802 publication, he became one of the first to use the term "biology" in its modern sense.
Lamarck continued his work as a premier authority on invertebrate zoology. He is remembered, at least in malacology, as a taxonomist of considerable stature.
The modern era generally remembers Lamarck for a theory of inheritance of acquired characteristics, called Lamarckism (inaccurately named after him), soft inheritance, or use/disuse theory, which he described in his 1809 Philosophie Zoologique.

only a small element of his theory of evolution, and

was in his time accepted by many natural historians.

In 1801, he published Système des Animaux sans Vertebres, a major work on the classification of invertebrates. In the work, he introduced definitions of natural groups among invertebrates.

Lamarck's contribution to evolutionary theory consisted of the first truly cohesive theory of biological evolution,in which an alchemical complexifying force drove organisms up a ladder of complexity, and a second environmental force adapted them to local environments through use and disuse of characteristics, differentiating them from other organisms.

Scientists have debated whether advances in the field of transgenerational epigenetics mean that Lamarck was to an extent correct, or not.

a theory of evolution based on

the principle that physical changes in organisms during their lifetime such as greater development of an organ or a part through increased use could be transmitted to their offsprings.
1. LAW OF USE AND DISSUSE
Individual loose characteristics they do not required and develop those which are useful .
2.INHERITENCE OF ACQUIRED TRAITS
Individuals inherit the acquired traits of their ancestors.

leads to offspring with longer necks.


Streching of muscles

in a blacksmith’sarm
leads to son with like musculas development.

THIS THEORY WAS DISPROVED LATER

increase the volume of all organs which possess the force

of life, and the force of life extends the dimensions of those parts up to an extent that those parts bring to themselves;"
"The production of a new organ in an animal body, results from a new requirement arising. and which continues to make itself felt, and a new movement which that requirement gives birth to, and its upkeep/maintenance;"
The development of the organs, and their ability, are constantly a result of the use of those organs.
All that has been acquired, traced, or changed, in the physiology of individuals, during their life, is conserved through the genesis, reproduction, and transmitted to new individuals who are related to those who have undergone those changes."

arises when biologists attempt to define what a species is.

Such a definition is called a species concept; there are at least 26 recognized species concepts. A species concept that works well for sexually reproducing organisms such as birds is useless for species that reproduce asexually, such as bacteria. The scientific study of the species problem has been called microtaxonomy.

One common, but sometimes difficult, question is how best to decide which species an organism belongs to, because reproductively isolated groups may not be readily recognizable, and cryptic species may be present. There is a continuum from reproductive isolation with no interbreeding, to panmixis, unlimited interbreeding. Populations can move forward or backwards along this continuum, at any point meeting the criteria for one or another species concept, and failing others.

different from what Charles Darwin and others meant by it

during the 19th and early 20th centuries. For Darwin, the species problem was the question of how new species arose. Darwin was however one of the first people to question how well-defined species are, given that they constantly change.

in a vertical chain, with gradation between the lowest forms

and the highest forms of life, thus demonstrating a path to progressive developments in nature.

In his own work, Lamarck had favored the then-more traditional theory based on the classical four elements.

molecular, cellular, and developmental biology, there is no basic mechanism

that evolutionists are attempting to elucidate.
There is no single cause of the evolutionary change in the properties of members of a species. Natural selection may be involved but so are random events, patterns of migration and interbreeding, mutational events, and horizontal transfer of genes across species bounds.

to occur. Individuals must be different, so there is variation

in the population. They must also be able to pass this variation on to offspring. Finally, individuals must compete for resources that limit the number of offspring they can produce. Individuals with variations that allow them to obtain more resources are likely to produce more offspring like themselves.

Evolution also depends on context and environment, which notoriously change constantly in unpredictable ways. For example, fishes who start living and evolving in unlit caves often lose their eyes, because the costs of developing them outweigh their advantages.

to influence fetal development with both immediate and life-long consequences.

Such environmentally-induced changes can occur at all levels of biological organization.
Ultimately, these influences may be epigenetic in nature, inducing mitotically heritable alterations in gene expression without changing the DNA. Epigenetics can be studied in a reductionist manner (Molecular) to understand the manner in which gene expression is altered.
Alternatively, epigenetic modifications can be examined as consequences (Molar) amplifying through higher levels of biological organization. For example, these alterations can bring about functional differences in brain and behavior that result in changes in the phenotype

functional differences in brain and behavior that result in changes

in the phenotype
Behavior is the product of brain activity and is an emergent property. Behavior becomes an externalized signal that changes the social environment; in essence the individual’s behavior creates its own niche space and modifies how individuals respond to conspecifics and their environment. The evolutionary impact of such questions is still an open question. What is known is that human society has changed the ecosystem in a manner that has had demonstrable impact on the health of humans and wildlife.

genetic drift,
mutation,
population mating structure, and
culture.