Разделы презентаций


Greek Philosophy Part I (PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY)

Содержание

Geography of GreeceGreece is a small country in Europe.Greece is near the Mediterranean Sea.The main part of Greece in on a peninsula.A peninsula is a body of land surrounded by water

Слайды и текст этой презентации

Слайд 1Greek Philosophy Part I (PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY)

Greek Philosophy Part I   (PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY)

Слайд 2Geography of Greece
Greece is a small country in Europe.
Greece is

near the Mediterranean Sea.
The main part of Greece in on

a peninsula.
A peninsula is a body of land surrounded by water on three sides.
The rest of Greece is made up of islands.
Geography of GreeceGreece is a small country in Europe.Greece is near the Mediterranean Sea.The main part of

Слайд 3I. INTRODUCTION A. Introduction
Ancient Greece
Refers to the period of

Greek history lasting from ca. 1100 BC (Dorian invasion), to

146 BC and the Roman conquest of Greece (Battle of Corinth).
The seminal culture which provided the foundation of Western civilization.
Greek culture had a powerful influence on the Roman Empire, which carried a version of it to many parts of Europe.
The civilization of the ancient Greeks has been immensely influential on language, politics, educational systems, philosophy, science, and art.
I. 	INTRODUCTION A. Introduction Ancient Greece Refers to the period of Greek history lasting from ca. 1100

Слайд 4I. INTRODUCTION A. Introduction
Ancient Greek Philosophy
focuses on the role

of reason and inquiry.
Many philosophers today concede that Greek

philosophy has shaped the entire Western thought since its inception.
Clear unbroken lines of influence lead from ancient Greek and Hellenistic philosophers, to medieval Muslim philosophers, to the European Renaissance and Enlightenment.
Early Greek philosophy, in turn, was influenced by the older wisdom literature and mythological cosmogonies of the Near East.
Nonetheless, philosophy is a Greek creation.
I. 	INTRODUCTION A. Introduction Ancient Greek Philosophy focuses on the role of reason and inquiry. Many philosophers

Слайд 5
І – Pre-Socratic – Philosophy of nature (VІ –

1st half of V с. BC),


ІІ – Classic - Classical greek philosophy (2nd half of V – ІV с. BC),

ІІІ – Hellenistic - Late antique philosophy (end of ІV с. BC – V с. AD).

Stages of the development of ancient Greek philosophy

І – Pre-Socratic – Philosophy of nature (VІ – 1st half of V с. BC),

Слайд 6II. PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY A. Introduction
The Pre-Socratic philosophers were active before

Socrates or contemporaneously, but expounding knowledge developed earlier.
It is

sometimes difficult to determine the actual line of argument some pre-Socratics used in supporting their particular views.
While most of them produced significant texts, none of the texts have survived in complete form.
All we have are quotations by later philosophers and historians, and the occasional textual fragment.
Pre-Socratic philosophers rejected mythological in favor of more rational explanations.
II. 	PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY A. Introduction The Pre-Socratic philosophers were active before Socrates or contemporaneously, but expounding knowledge

Слайд 7II. PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY A. Introduction
The Pre-Socratics concerned themselves with
Philosophy

(love of knowledge and wisdom)
Began with natural explanations (logos) replacing

supernatural explanations (mythos).
Cosmology
The explanation of origin, structure, and processes governing the universe (cosmos).
The universe was orderly and thus, in principle, explainable.
They began a process of asking questions, defining problems and identifying paradoxes.
II. 	PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY A. Introduction The Pre-Socratics concerned themselves with Philosophy (love of knowledge and wisdom)Began with

Слайд 8II. PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY A. Introduction
The Pre-Socratics
The questions some Pre-Socratics asked:
From

where does everything come?
From what is everything created?
How

do we explain the plurality of things found in nature?
How might we describe nature mathematically?
Others concentrated on defining problems and paradoxes that the basis for later mathematical, scientific and philosophic study.
Later philosophers rejected the answers they provided, but continued to place importance on their questions.
II. 	PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY A. Introduction The Pre-SocraticsThe questions some Pre-Socratics asked:From where does everything come? From what

Слайд 9II. PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY B. Milesian school
Milesian school
Was a school

of thought founded in the 6th C. BC.
The ideas

associated with it are exemplified by philosophers from the Ionian town of Miletus, on the Aegean coast of Anatolia
These philosophers introduced new opinions contrary to the prevailing viewpoint on how the world was organized.
Natural phenomena were explained solely by the will of anthropomorphized gods.
They presented a view of nature in terms of methodologically observable entities, and as such was one of the first truly scientific philosophies.
II. 	PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY B. Milesian school Milesian school Was a school of thought founded in the 6th

Слайд 10Thales (b c.624 BCE): The first Pre-Socratic
“All is water” The

discovery of nature and the rejection of mythopoeic explanations

Thales (b c.624 BCE): The first Pre-Socratic“All is water” The discovery of nature and the rejection of

Слайд 11II. PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY B. Milesian school
Thales (624-546 BCE)
First philosopher
Emphasized natural

explanations while minimizing supernatural ones.
The universe consists of natural

substances and is governed by natural principles.
Universe is knowable and understandable.
Thales searched for the one single substance from which all others were derived- the physis or primary element.
The physis was water.
He ushered in the critical tradition – the criticism and questioning of others’ teachings and views.
II. 	PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY B. Milesian school Thales (624-546 BCE)First philosopherEmphasized natural explanations while minimizing supernatural ones. The

Слайд 12II. PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY B. Milesian school
Anaximander (610-546 BCE)
Physis is

the source of all things.
He called it "apeiron", which

means unlimited, indeterminate, or infinite
Anaximenes (585 -525 BCE)
Probably a younger contemporary of Anaximander, whose pupil or friend he is said to have been.[1]
He held the Physis to be air (translates to mist)
Everything is air at different degrees of density, and under the influence of heat, which expands, and of cold, which contracts its volume, it gives rise to the several phases of existence.
II. 	PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY B. Milesian school Anaximander (610-546 BCE) Physis is the source of all things. He

Слайд 13Heraclitus (535-475 BCE)

Heraclitus (535-475 BCE)

Слайд 14II. PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY C. Heraclitus
Heraclitus (535-475 BCE)
Nature is in

a constant state of flux or change.
Physis is fire because

it transforms all things into something else.
World is always “becoming” – never “is”
All things exist between polar opposites – must have opposites.
Epistemological question
How can one know something if it is always changing?
The veracity of the senses began to be questioned.
Rationalists believe that there are knowable things in the universe, while empiricists believe that everything is constantly changing and thus incapable of being known.
II. 	PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY C. Heraclitus Heraclitus (535-475 BCE) Nature is in a constant state of flux or

Слайд 15Parmenides (510-440 BCE)

Parmenides (510-440 BCE)

Слайд 16II. PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY D. Eleatics
The Eleatics
Were a school of

philosophers at Elea (a Greek colony in Campania, Italy)
Founded

in the early fifth century BCE by Parmenides, with Zeno of Elea his student.
Parmenides (510-440 BCE)
All things are constant; change is an illusion
One reality: finite, uniform, motionless, and fixed
Knowledge comes only through reason (rationalism)
Sensory experience is not real, not to be trusted
II. 	PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY D. Eleatics The Eleatics Were a school of philosophers at Elea (a Greek colony

Слайд 17II. PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY D. Eleatics
Zeno (490-430 BCE)
Disciple of Parmenides
Used

logical arguments (paradoxes) to show that motion was an illusion

to support Parmenides.
The paradox of Achilles and the Tortoise
Achilles is in a footrace with the tortoise. Achilles allows the tortoise a head start of 100 feet.
If we suppose that each racer starts running at some constant speed (one very fast and one very slow), then after some finite time, Achilles will have run 100 feet, bringing him to the tortoise's starting point.
II. 	PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY D. Eleatics Zeno (490-430 BCE) Disciple of ParmenidesUsed logical arguments (paradoxes) to show that

Слайд 18II. PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY D. Eleatics
The paradox of Achilles and the

Tortoise
During this time, the tortoise has run a much shorter

distance, say, 10 feet.
It will then take Achilles some further time to run that distance, by which time the tortoise will have advanced farther; and then more time still to reach this third point, while the tortoise moves ahead.
Thus, whenever Achilles reaches somewhere the tortoise has been, he still has farther to go.
Therefore, because there are an infinite number of points Achilles must reach where the tortoise has already been, he can never overtake the tortoise.
Simple experience tells us that Achilles will be able to overtake the tortoise, which is why this is a paradox.
II. 	PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY D. Eleatics The paradox of Achilles and the TortoiseDuring this time, the tortoise has

Слайд 19Pythagoras (582-496 BCE)

Pythagoras (582-496 BCE)

Слайд 20II. PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY F. Pythagorean School
Pythagorean School
Pythagoreans, who were much

influenced by mathematics and probably a very inspirational source for

Plato and Platonism.
Pythagoras (582-496 BCE) and the Pythagoreans.
First to use the term philosopher and call himself a philosopher
Explanation of the universe is found in numbers and numerical relationships
Applied mathematical principles to human experience
Numbers and numerical relationships were real and influenced the empirical world
II. 	PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY F. Pythagorean School Pythagorean SchoolPythagoreans, who were much influenced by mathematics and probably a

Слайд 21II. PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY F. Pythagorean School
Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans (continued)
Illness

was thought to result from a disruption of the body’s

equilibrium
Nothing is perfect in the empirical world; perfection is in abstract mathematical world and known only by reason
The Pythagoreans proposed a dualistic universe
One part abstract, permanent, and knowable (similar to Parmenides)
One part empirical, changing, and known through the senses, but senses cannot provide knowledge (similar to Heraclitus)
II. 	PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY F. Pythagorean School Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans (continued)Illness was thought to result from a

Слайд 22II. PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY F. Pythagorean School
Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans (continued)
The

Pythagoreans lived a strict, disciplined life.
They crusaded against vice, lawlessness,

and bodily excess and believed that experiences in the flesh (senses) were inferior to experiences in the mind
Affected Plato’s views and impacted early Christian thought.
II. 	PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY F. Pythagorean School Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans (continued)The Pythagoreans lived a strict, disciplined life.They

Слайд 23Democritus (460-370 BCE)

Democritus (460-370 BCE)

Слайд 24II. PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY H. Atomist School
Atomist School
They taught that

the hidden substance in all physical objects consists of different

arrangements of 1) atoms and 2) void.
Both atoms and the void were never created, and they will be never ending.
Democritus (460-370 BCE)
First completely naturalistic description of the universe
All things were made of tiny particles called atoms
Characteristics of things are determined by shape, size, number, location, and arrangement of atoms.
II. 	PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY H. Atomist School Atomist School They taught that the hidden substance in all physical

Слайд 25II. PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY H. Atomist School
Democritus (460-370 BCE)
All things

and events, animate, inanimate, and cognitive can be reduced to

atoms and atomic activity.
Atom’s behavior is lawful (determinism)
All things explained by atomic activity (elementism)
Events and phenomena explained in terms of another, more elemental level (reductionism).
Described sensation and perception in terms of atoms emanating from the surface of objects and entering the body through the sensory systems and then transmitted to the brain.
II. 	PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY H. Atomist School Democritus (460-370 BCE) All things and events, animate, inanimate, and cognitive

Слайд 26II. PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY I. The Sophists
Sophists
In the second half of the

5th C BCE, particularly at Athens, "sophist" came to denote

a class of itinerant intellectuals who:
taught courses in "excellence" or "virtue”
speculated about the nature of language and culture
employed rhetoric to achieve their purposes, generally to persuade or convince others.
They held that truth is relative – no single truth exists
But claimed that they could find the answers to all questions.
II. 	PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY I. The SophistsSophistsIn the second half of the 5th C BCE, particularly at Athens,

Слайд 27Protogoras (490-420 BCE)

Protogoras (490-420 BCE)

Слайд 28II. PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY I. The Sophists
Protogoras (490-420 BCE)
Truth depends on the

perceiver.
Perception varies from person to person because each perceiver has

different experiences.
Truth is partially determined by culture
To understand why a person believes as a person does, one must understand the person.
Agnostic toward the Greek gods
Philosophy of relativity of truth is still present today in postmodernism.
II. 	PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY I. The SophistsProtogoras (490-420 BCE)Truth depends on the perceiver.Perception varies from person to person

Слайд 29II. PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY I. The Sophists
Gorgias (487-376 BCE)
Gorgias took a

more extreme position than Protogoras – all things are equally

false
There is no objective basis of truth – nihilism – one can only be aware of one’s own experiences and mental states – solipsism.
He came to three conclusions:
Nothing exists
If it did exist, it could not be comprehended
If it could be comprehended, it could not be
Spoken words had power but they were essentially deceitful.
II. 	PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY I. The SophistsGorgias (487-376 BCE) Gorgias took a more extreme position than Protogoras –

Слайд 30II. PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY I. The Sophists
Xenophanes (570-470 BCE)
Attacked veracity of

religion before the Sophists
Xenophanes stated that religion is a

human invention. His evidence was:
Olympian gods act suspiciously like humans
Gods of different peoples look like the people themselves
Humans create religion – moral codes come from man
He was not an atheist
Postulated a god that was unlike any other described during that time.
II. 	PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY I. The SophistsXenophanes (570-470 BCE) Attacked veracity of religion before the Sophists Xenophanes stated

Обратная связь

Если не удалось найти и скачать доклад-презентацию, Вы можете заказать его на нашем сайте. Мы постараемся найти нужный Вам материал и отправим по электронной почте. Не стесняйтесь обращаться к нам, если у вас возникли вопросы или пожелания:

Email: Нажмите что бы посмотреть 

Что такое TheSlide.ru?

Это сайт презентации, докладов, проектов в PowerPoint. Здесь удобно  хранить и делиться своими презентациями с другими пользователями.


Для правообладателей

Яндекс.Метрика