Разделы презентаций


UTILIZATION OF SEISMIC AND INFRASOUND SIGNALS FOR CHARACTERIZING MINING

Microseismic SystemSensors:  Uniaxial and triaxial accelerometers and/or geophones.Junction Box - (JB): A NEMA-4 enclosure that houses essential acquisition and communications equipment including the Paladin® digital seismic recorder which serves as the backbone

Слайды и текст этой презентации

Слайд 1UTILIZATION OF SEISMIC AND INFRASOUND SIGNALS FOR CHARACTERIZING MINING EXPLOSIONS
Pawlenko M.

UTILIZATION OF SEISMIC AND INFRASOUND SIGNALS FOR CHARACTERIZING MINING EXPLOSIONSPawlenko M.

Слайд 3Microseismic System

Sensors:  Uniaxial and triaxial accelerometers and/or geophones.
Junction Box - (JB):

A NEMA-4 enclosure that houses essential acquisition and communications equipment

including the Paladin® digital seismic recorder which serves as the backbone of ESG’s microseismic data acquisition system.
Ethernet communication: Fiber (underground) or radio (surface) for reliable, full waveform data transfer.
Acquisition PC: Acquisition Server, watchdog, optional large external storage drive and uninterruptable power supply (UPS).
Processing PC: Fast multi-core Processor and powerful dedicated video card.
Microseismic SystemSensors:  Uniaxial and triaxial accelerometers and/or geophones.Junction Box - (JB): A NEMA-4 enclosure that houses essential acquisition

Слайд 4Figure 1: Peak Pg amplitudes observed at array element 03

of PDAR (360 km range) from contained singlefired explosions, delay-fired

cast blasts and delay-fired coal shots
Figure 1: Peak Pg amplitudes observed at array element 03 of PDAR (360 km range) from contained

Слайд 5Figure 2: Peak P and Rg amplitudes observed at EYMN

(Ely, Minnesota) from taconite fragmentation explosions approximately 110 km to the

southwest of the station.
Figure 2: Peak P and Rg amplitudes observed at EYMN (Ely, Minnesota) from taconite fragmentation explosions approximately

Слайд 6Figure 3: Peak amplitudes of in-mine recordings at Morenci are

compared to total amount of explosives used in copper fragmentation

blasts (left). Peak Pg, Lg and Rg amplitudes observed at the regional station TUC plotted against total amount of explosives used in the Morenci copper fragmentation explosions (right).
Figure 3: Peak amplitudes of in-mine recordings at Morenci are compared to total amount of explosives used

Слайд 7Figure 4: The three components of the equivalent mining explosion

source model are represented pictorially. They consist of (a) the directly

coupled energy from the contained explosion modeled as a Mueller-Murphy source function, (b) vertical spall due to the tensile failure of near-surface materials and (c) horizontal spall accompanying cast blasting when overburden is cast horizontally into a pit.
Figure 4: The three components of the equivalent mining explosion source model are represented pictorially. They consist

Слайд 8Figure 5: Spall mass (per hole) for the taconite hard

rock explosions (open diamonds) and a single coal cast blast

(star) was estimated from blasting logs. These empirical estimates from mining explosions are compared to the Viecelli and Sobel spall mass scaling relations developed for underground nuclear explosions.
Figure 5: Spall mass (per hole) for the taconite hard rock explosions (open diamonds) and a single

Слайд 9Figure 6: The mining explosion source model was used to

produce synthetics for a distance and crustal velocity model appropriate

for EYMN. Synthetics were produced for a number of mining explosions of different average charge weight per borehole. Peak amplitudes of the synthetics are compared to the observations from the same explosions.
Figure 6: The mining explosion source model was used to produce synthetics for a distance and crustal

Слайд 10Figure 7: The mining explosion source model was also used

to compute synthetics for the large-scale cast blasts. The focus

in this modeling exercise is on the long period surface waves.
Figure 7: The mining explosion source model was also used to compute synthetics for the large-scale cast

Слайд 11Figure 8: Mining explosions from the hard rock copper mines

in southeastern Arizona generate infrasound signals as exemplified by the

records from DLIAR in Los Alamos (left). Ground truth for this event was provided by close-in seismic and acoustic records of the blast (left, inset). Frequency wave number estimates were used to make the back azimuth estimate shown to the right.
Figure 8: Mining explosions from the hard rock copper mines in southeastern Arizona generate infrasound signals as

Слайд 12Figure 9: Infrasound (channels 1,2, 3) and seismic data (channel

4) from a seismo-acoustic station installed outside El Paso, Texas (Ft.

Hancock). Each horizontal section represents 10 minutes of data. This seismo-acoustic signal that extends for over 30 minutes represents the explosion and burning of a natural gas line in New Mexico
Figure 9: Infrasound (channels 1,2, 3) and seismic data (channel 4) from a seismo-acoustic station installed outside

Слайд 13Figure 10: The details of the infrasound (channels 1-3) and

seismic (channel 4) signals from the gas explosion are shown to

the left. These signals are compared to close-in seismic signals of the blast shown to the right (courtesy of T. Wallace). Both the close-in seismic and the infrasound signals suggest a complex source function for the initial explosion. The seismo-acoustic station at Ft. Hancock has porous and slow velocity alluvium at the surface that may be responsible for the strong coupling between the infrasound and seismic channels.
Figure 10: The details of the infrasound (channels 1-3) and seismic (channel 4) signals from the gas

Слайд 14CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Seismic 1. Peak seismic amplitudes from delay-fired mining explosions

show little relation to explosive yield. 2. Single-fired, contained explosions generate

regional seismic waves with an amplitude scaled by explosive weight, W0.84. 3. Source models for mining explosions replicate the insensitivity of peak amplitude of regional phases to total explosive weight although there is some indication that the peak regional amplitudes may be related to the weight of the simultaneously detonated explosives, possibly a single borehole. 4. Mid-period (2-12 s) surface waves are observed from large scale cast blasts and reflect the large source duration of such explosions. 5. Blasting practice varies greatly between mines and within mines and in-mine instrumentation may be required to provide ground truth for regional seismogram interpretation. Infrasound 1. A small percentage of mining explosions are observed to have infrasound signals. 2. The presence or absence of regional infrasound signals is related to event size and propagation path effects. 3. Shallow explosions may produce infrasound signals but no regional seismic signals. 4. Infrasound signals may document source duration.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Seismic 1. Peak seismic amplitudes from delay-fired mining explosions show little relation to explosive

Обратная связь

Если не удалось найти и скачать доклад-презентацию, Вы можете заказать его на нашем сайте. Мы постараемся найти нужный Вам материал и отправим по электронной почте. Не стесняйтесь обращаться к нам, если у вас возникли вопросы или пожелания:

Email: Нажмите что бы посмотреть 

Что такое TheSlide.ru?

Это сайт презентации, докладов, проектов в PowerPoint. Здесь удобно  хранить и делиться своими презентациями с другими пользователями.


Для правообладателей

Яндекс.Метрика