Разделы презентаций


Introduction to the Madrid system

Содержание

Course OutlineOverview of the Madrid systemOptions for the Registration of MarksProcedural SummaryPhase I – Office of OriginPhase II – International BureauPhase III – Office of the Designated Contracting PartyManagement of the

Слайды и текст этой презентации

Слайд 1Introduction to the Madrid system
International Center of the Lomonosov

Moscow State University,
Geneva, May 31, 2012
Emily Erskine
Information and Promotion Division
Brands

and Designs Sector
The World Intellectual Property Organization
Introduction to the Madrid system International Center of the Lomonosov Moscow State University,Geneva, May 31, 2012 Emily

Слайд 2Course Outline

Overview of the Madrid system
Options for the Registration of

Marks
Procedural Summary
Phase I – Office of Origin
Phase II – International

Bureau
Phase III – Office of the Designated Contracting Party
Management of the International Registration
Practical Analysis of the Madrid system’s Operations
Users’ Views – Video
Case Studies

Course OutlineOverview of the Madrid systemOptions for the Registration of MarksProcedural SummaryPhase I – Office of OriginPhase

Слайд 3Overview of the Madrid system
Introduction
Objectives
Legal Background and Framework
Geographical

Scope
Basic Features
Advantages
Statistics
What’s New

Overview of the Madrid systemIntroductionObjectives Legal Background and Framework Geographical Scope Basic Features AdvantagesStatisticsWhat’s New

Слайд 4Madrid system: introduction
International Registration of marks administered by the International

Bureau of WIPO: Headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland
Offers filing, registration and

management of trademarks under 87 jurisdictions worldwide (http://www.wipo.int/madrid/en/members/)
More than 1, 000 000 Marks registered in 120 Years
A legal tool – grant and enforcement of rights
A business tool – access to international trade
A marketing tool - branding
An administrative tool – facilitates and centralizes formalities
http://www.wipo.int/multimedia/en/madrid/madrid-videos/index.html (users’ points of view)



Madrid system: introductionInternational Registration of marks administered by the International Bureau of WIPO: Headquarters in Geneva, SwitzerlandOffers

Слайд 5Objectives
Obtaining and maintaining protection of marks in several countries through

a single international application

Simple, flexible, user-friendly, time and cost-effective option

to access a wide range of export markets through one central filing, registration, maintenance and management mechanism

An option to the traditional national or regional route


ObjectivesObtaining and maintaining protection of marks in several countries through a single international applicationSimple, flexible, user-friendly, time

Слайд 6One System - Two Treaties

Madrid Agreement concerning the International Registration

of Marks (1891)
Protocol Relating to the Madrid Agreement (1989)

One System - Two TreatiesMadrid Agreement concerning the International Registration of Marks (1891)Protocol Relating to the Madrid

Слайд 7Differences between the Agreement and the Protocol

Differences between the Agreement and the Protocol

Слайд 8Legal Background
1883

1891

1989

Legal Background 188318911989

Слайд 9Legal Framework I
Madrid Agreement (1891)
Madrid Protocol (1989)
Common Regulations (1996)
Administrative Instructions

(2002)
Nice Agreement (Classification - 1957)
Vienna Agreement (Classification - 1973)
National/Regional Laws

& Regulations of Contracting Parties (http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/)

Legal Framework IMadrid Agreement (1891)Madrid Protocol (1989)Common Regulations (1996)Administrative Instructions (2002)Nice Agreement (Classification - 1957)Vienna Agreement (Classification

Слайд 10Legal Framework II
Madrid Treaties and Regulations
Basic principles and mechanism

of the Madrid system
formal conditions
filing procedures
centralized registration

and management

Domestic Laws and Regulations of Contracting Parties
Define conditions to grant trademark protection
Establish procedures for trademark protection
Determine rights that result from protection

Legal Framework IIMadrid Treaties and Regulations Basic principles and mechanism of the Madrid system formal conditions filing

Слайд 11Geographical Scope

Geographical Scope

Слайд 12Basic Features 1 – Application
Entitlement (Articles 2 & 3,

Paris Convention)
Basic application or registration
Exclusively through the Office of Origin
Form:

MM1 (A) or MM2 (P) or MM3 (AP)
Languages: English/French/Spanish
Classification: Nice Classification
Fees
Designations (between 1 and 87 options)

Basic Features 1 – Application Entitlement (Articles 2 & 3, Paris Convention)Basic application or registrationExclusively through the

Слайд 13Precondition
Madrid Agreement and Madrid Protocol
Articles 2 & 3 - Paris

Convention

PreconditionMadrid Agreement and Madrid ProtocolArticles 2 & 3 - Paris Convention

Слайд 14Connections
Establishment
Domicile
Nationality
Common Treaty
Applicant
Office of Origin
Member State or Organization of Office

of Origin
Designated Contracting Party
Member State or Organization
1
2

Connections EstablishmentDomicileNationalityCommon TreatyApplicantOffice of OriginMember State or Organization of Office of OriginDesignated Contracting PartyMember State or Organization12

Слайд 15Basic Features 2 - Registration
Possibility of Refusal by designated Contracting

Party (deadline)
Statement of Grant of protection
Extension to new Contracting

Parties
Changes/Modifications
5 year dependency period
Central attack – Ceasing of effects (withdrawal, lapse, renunciation, final decision of rejection, cancellation or invalidation)
Transformation of the international registration into national or regional applications
10 years term of protection renewable every 10 years
Basic Features 2 - RegistrationPossibility of Refusal by designated Contracting Party (deadline)Statement of Grant of protection Extension

Слайд 16Synopsis: Advantages for Trademark Owners
A TM owner can register his

mark in all the countries party to the system by

filing:
a single international application
in one language (English, French or Spanish)
subject to one set of fees (one currency)
no Associate fees required at filing

Thereafter, the international registration can be maintained and renewed through a single procedure
subsequent changes to the International Register
extension to more countries

The Madrid system therefore reduces the administrative burden and costs involved in registering and maintaining marks in several countries

Synopsis: Advantages for Trademark OwnersA TM owner can register his mark in all the countries party to

Слайд 17

http://www.wipo.int/madrid/en/statistics/

Statistics

http://www.wipo.int/madrid/en/statistics/Statistics

Слайд 18International Registrations in Force on December 31, 2011
Registrations in force:

540,089
Containing some 5 540 000 active designations
Belonging to

178, 507 different right-holders (many of them SMEs)

40, 711 international registrations recorded by the International Bureau

International Registrations in Force on December 31, 2011Registrations in force: 540,089  Containing some 5 540 000

Слайд 19Comparison - Statistics 2010 - 2011

Comparison - Statistics 2010 - 2011

Слайд 20Major Filing Contracting Parties in 2011

Major Filing Contracting Parties in 2011

Слайд 21Most Designated Contracting Parties – Registration and Post Registration

Most Designated Contracting Parties – Registration and Post Registration

Слайд 22Most Popular Classes in International Registrations in 2011

Most Popular Classes in International Registrations in 2011

Слайд 23The Oldest Valid International Mark








Originally registered in Switzerland in 1889

then internationally in 1893


The Oldest Valid International Mark Originally registered in Switzerland in 1889 then internationally in 1893

Слайд 24The One Million Mark

The One Million Mark

Слайд 26Recent Development in 2011
Mandatory Statements of Grant of Protection as

of January 1, 2011
Two anniversaries in April 2011:
120 years

of the Madrid system (April 14, 1891)
15 years of operations of the Madrid Protocol (April 1, 1996)


Recent Development in 2011Mandatory Statements of Grant of Protection as of January 1, 2011Two anniversaries in April

Слайд 27Recent Accessions
Recent accessions to the Madrid Protocol
April 25, 2012: Philippines
May

29, 2012: Columbia
March 2012 Mexico – Approval by Senate
2011: Tajikistan

Future

accessions – under consideration
Costa Rica and Dominican Republic
ASEAN countries by 2015
India
Barbados, Jamaica and Trinidad & Tobago
Malta
New Zealand
South Africa
ARIPO

Madrid Protocol

Recent AccessionsRecent accessions to the Madrid ProtocolApril 25, 2012: PhilippinesMay 29, 2012: ColumbiaMarch 2012 Mexico – Approval

Слайд 28Some Information Products and Services


3 New Web-based Communication Services: http://www.wipo.int/madrid/en/services
Madrid

Real-time Status (MRS) – Status of applications
Madrid Electronic Alert (MEA)

– Status of registrations
Madrid Portfolio Manager (MPM) – Management of trademark portfolio

The Madrid Highlights – First Edition – March 2012

Legal texts, Guide to the International Registration of Marks, Information Notices, Forms, List of Contracting Parties

Fee Calculator: Cost Estimate (Various Operations)

Madrid Simulator: International Application Simulator

Madrid system Goods and Services Manager

WIPO Gazette

ROMARIN: on-line search database

http://www.wipo.int/madrid/en/

Some Information Products and Services3 New Web-based Communication Services: http://www.wipo.int/madrid/en/servicesMadrid Real-time Status (MRS) – Status of applicationsMadrid

Слайд 29Options for the Registration of Marks

Options for the Registration of Marks

Слайд 303 Ways to Register a Trademark
The National Route

The Regional Route
African

Regional Industrial Property Office (ARIPO)
Office for the Harmonization of the

Internal Market (OHIM)
Organisation Africaine de la Propriété Intellectuelle (OAPI)

The International Route - Madrid System

Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP)

3 Ways to Register a TrademarkThe National RouteThe Regional RouteAfrican Regional Industrial Property Office (ARIPO)Office for the

Слайд 31The National Route vs. the Madrid Route
Several offices for filing
Several

application forms
Several languages
Several currencies
Several registrations
Several renewals
Several modifications
Foreign attorney needed from

filing

One Office for filing
One single application form
One language (E/F/S)
One currency (CHF)
One international registration
One renewal
One modification
Foreign attorney first needed in case of refusal

The National Route vs. the Madrid RouteSeveral offices for filingSeveral application formsSeveral languagesSeveral currenciesSeveral registrationsSeveral renewalsSeveral modificationsForeign

Слайд 32Procedural Summary – Madrid system
International Registration Procedure
Phase I – Office

of Origin
Phase II – International Bureau
Phase III – Office of

the Designated Contracting Party
Management of the International Registration
Case Studies: Management of Internaitonal Registration
Subsequent Designation
Transfer of rights
Refusals – Responding through Request for Limitation of Goods and Services
Licenses
Change of Representative

Procedural Summary – Madrid systemInternational Registration ProcedurePhase I – Office of OriginPhase II – International BureauPhase III

Слайд 33International Registration Procedure
International Application
OFFICE OF ORIGIN
Certifies entitlement/basic mark and

forwards the application to the IB
INTERNATIONAL BUREAU
OFFICES OF DESIGNATED CONTRACTING PARTIES
Formal examination
Records in the

International Register
Publishes in the International Gazette
Notifies designated Contracting Parties

Substantive Examination – Time Limit

Grant of Protection

Provisional Refusal

International Registration Procedure International ApplicationOFFICE OF  ORIGINCertifies entitlement/basic mark and forwards the application to the IBINTERNATIONAL

Слайд 34Phase I - Examination Procedure (OO)

Phase I - Examination Procedure (OO)

Слайд 35Phase II – Examination Procedure 1 (IB)

Phase II – Examination Procedure 1 (IB)

Слайд 36Examination Procedure 2 (IB) No Irregularities

Examination Procedure 2 (IB)  No Irregularities

Слайд 37Examination Procedure 3 (IB) : Irregularities

Examination Procedure 3 (IB) : Irregularities

Слайд 38 Phase III - Examination Procedure (Designated CP)

Phase III - Examination Procedure (Designated CP)

Слайд 39Grounds for Refusals
Absolute Grounds
devoid of any distinctive character
generic
descriptive: indicate

the kind, quality, quantity, purpose, value, place of origin of

goods
service marks that are likely to deceive consumers
considered to be contrary to public order or morality («baby girl» 4 smoking items)
contrary to honest practices in industrial or commercial matters
Grounds for RefusalsAbsolute Groundsdevoid of any distinctive charactergeneric descriptive: indicate the kind, quality, quantity, purpose, value, place

Слайд 40Distinctive
Not Distinctive
Safari 4 Jewellery
« Football World Cup 2012 » 4

Sports Events
«Crispy» 4 chips
1818DZX for Cosmetics
Apple 4 Computers or Cell

Phones

Grounds for Refusals – Absolute Grounds

Generic

«Phone» 4 Mobile Phone

Descriptive

«Sweets» 4 Confectionery

DistinctiveNot DistinctiveSafari 4 Jewellery« Football World Cup 2012 » 4 Sports Events«Crispy» 4 chips1818DZX for CosmeticsApple 4

Слайд 41Relative Grounds for Refusals
Where there exists a likelihood of confusion

with an earlier trade mark and when an identical/similar trade

mark is to be used on goods or services which are identical/similar to the earlier registered mark
Other issues such as the nature of the goods or services, their methods of use, end users and whether they are in competition with each other are considered when assessing similarity


EARLIER MARK
COSMOPOLITAN
(MAGAZINES)

REGIONAL APPLICATION
COSMOPOLITAN
(COSMETICS)

Relative Grounds for RefusalsWhere there exists a likelihood of confusion with an earlier trade mark and when

Слайд 42Refusals – Procedures to Responses
Governed by national law – vary

from country to country
Strategies/procedures for responding also vary accordingly –

specificities
Likely first step
Decide early on strategy
Appoint local representative – not mandatory (advisable)
Obtain advice


Refusals – Procedures to ResponsesGoverned by national law – vary from country to countryStrategies/procedures for responding also

Слайд 43Roles Case Studies

Roles Case Studies

Слайд 44The Role of the Office of Origin I International Application
Concordance between

the basic mark and the international mark
Applicant
Goods and Services
Color Combination

and claim
Certification and signature
Presentation – postal order, eletronic means, fax transmission
(Article 1(2); Article 2(2))
Guidance
Irregularities
Fees


Article 3(1)
Rules 9(1), 9(5)(d) and 11(7)
The Role of the Office of Origin I International ApplicationConcordance between the basic mark and the international

Слайд 45The Role of the Office of Origin II International Registration
Notification to

the IB of cancellation, refusal, withdrawal or ceasing of effects

of basic mark within the dependency period
Transmission of other requests to the IB, i.e., TR – EX
Notify IB of Changes in the Basic Mark
Request for Cancellation of the International Registration
The Role of the Office of Origin II International RegistrationNotification to the IB of cancellation, refusal, withdrawal

Слайд 46The Role of the International Bureau International Application/Registration
Procedural
Counterchecks formalities
International Registration

Number and Date
Records in the International Register
Notifies designated Contracting

Parties
Informs Office of Origin
Sends a Certificate to holder
Publishes in the Gazette
Centralized Management

Rules 9, 11, 12, 13 and 15
The Role of the International Bureau International Application/RegistrationProceduralCounterchecks formalitiesInternational Registration Number and Date Records in the International

Слайд 47International Registration Date = date the OO certifies having received

application (unchanged)
January 2, 2012
Reception by OO
March 2, 2012 Reception by

IB

2 months

International Registration Date = date the OO certifies having received application (unchanged)January 2, 2012Reception by OOMarch 2,

Слайд 48International Registration Date
International Registration Date = date IB receives complete/corrected

application (modified)


2 months
March 1, 2012 Reception by OO
May 1, 2012

Reception by IB

Beyond 2 month period

May 14, 2012
Reception by IB

International Registration DateInternational Registration Date = date IB receives complete/corrected application (modified)2 monthsMarch 1, 2012 Reception by

Слайд 49Effects of the International Registration
International Registration = National Application/Registration
A National

Application until the expiry of the time limit to issue

a refusal
A National Registration when the time limit to issue a refusal expires
A National Registration in case:
No Refusal within time limit
Refusal not regarded as such
Refusal Withdrawn
Only concern designated CPs - territorial
(Article 4)




Effects of the International RegistrationInternational Registration = National Application/RegistrationA National Application until the expiry of the time

Слайд 50The Role of the Office of the Designated Contracting Party

I
Substantive Examination of the International Registration
Decision
Grant of Protection
Refusal
Opposition
Final Decision
Substantive Examination

of Subsequent designations

The Role of the Office of the Designated Contracting Party ISubstantive Examination of the International RegistrationDecisionGrant of

Слайд 51The Role of the Office of the Designated Contracting Party

II
Notify the International Bureau
Mandatory Statement of Grant of Protection (2011)
Provisional

Refusal within time limit
Confirmation of Refusal or Grant of Protection
Further Decision in case of an appeal
Declaration that a limitation has no effect
Replacement of a national or regional registration
The effects of an IR have been invalidated
Transformation of IR into national/regional application
Other matters
The Role of the Office of the Designated Contracting Party IINotify the International BureauMandatory Statement of Grant

Слайд 52Management of an International Registration I
Subsequent Designation
Change in Ownership
Change

in name and/or address of Holder
Change in name and/or address

of Representative
Limitation (some G&S – some/all CPs)
Cancellation of G&S (some/all G&S – all CPs)
Renunciation (all G&S – some CPs)
Licenses
Renewal
Cancellation of the international registration
Management of an International Registration ISubsequent Designation Change in OwnershipChange in name and/or address of HolderChange in

Слайд 53Management of an International Registration II
Dependence


Ceasing of Effects


Independence


Management of an International Registration IIDependenceCeasing of EffectsIndependence

Слайд 54Ceasing of Effects
If a basic mark “ceases to have effect”

in whole or in part within 5 years of date of

IR, Office of Origin notifies IB, pursuant to Rule 22, and requests partial or total cancellation of IR

International Bureau cancels IR to the extent requested by Office of Origin. IB notifies all designated Contracting Parties of partial or total cancellation of IR, records and publishes the information
No particular action required; some designated Contracting Parties may update their databases

Ceasing of EffectsIf a basic mark “ceases to have effect” in whole or in part within 5

Слайд 55Dependence - Independence
What happens if the basic application or

registration is refused, withdrawn or ceases to have effect?


before the expiry of 5 years

5 years after the international registration

no effect, international registration becomes independent (Art. 6(2))’

international registration still depends on national mark (Art. 6(3)): risk of ‘central attack’

Dependence - Independence 	What happens if the basic application or registration is refused, withdrawn or ceases to

Слайд 56Practical Analysis of the Madrid system’s Operations
Users’ Views – Video
Shiseido
Treasury

Wine Estate


Case Studies

Practical Analysis of the Madrid system’s OperationsUsers’ Views – VideoShiseidoTreasury Wine EstateCase Studies

Слайд 57Qualification: Case Studies

Qualification: Case Studies

Слайд 58Case Study (1)

Case Study (1)

Слайд 59Case Study (2)

Case Study (2)

Слайд 60Case Study (3)
Achieving Trademark rights in the European Community and

the US for an Asian company
Applicant = Indian Company
Entitlement =

establishment in Mongolia
Designations = EM, US, + any others

Case Study (3)Achieving Trademark rights in the European Community and the US for an Asian companyApplicant =

Слайд 61Case Study 4 – RF/FD/LI

Holder of International Registration – Shiseido


Office of Origin – Italy (1977)– Entitlement
Class 21 –

Toilet utensils; cosmetic utensils.
Designations: ES, NA, KR, US, AT, CN, GH
Refusals from Korea and US only
Terms too vague (LI – proposed)
LI – Solution from Holder
Toilet utensils, namely, toilet sponges, toilet brushes and toilet brush holders; cosmetic utensils, namely, cosmetic brushes and cosmetic removing paper
Final Decision – Limitation (above)


Entitement
Designations
G&S
RF
LI
FD

Case Study 4 – RF/FD/LIHolder of International Registration – Shiseido Office of Origin – Italy (1977)– Entitlement

Слайд 62Case Study 6
IR May 26, 1985
Designations: 20 Contracting Parties
Classes: 7

classes
Refusal – 1 only (PL)
RF = all the goods and

services
FD = Reversal – Acceptance for all the goods and services

RF
FD (V)

Case Study 6IR May 26, 1985Designations: 20 Contracting PartiesClasses: 7 classesRefusal – 1 only (PL)RF = all

Слайд 63Case Study 7
EN/IR – 1993 – 10 Classes
EX (1CP/ALL G&S)


TR – 1999 (ALL CPs/3 G&S)
TR – 2000 – (ALL

CPs/ALL G&S)
RE – 2003 (1CP)
EX – (3 CPs/diff. G&S)
RE – 4 CPs
LI – (ALL CPs & ALL G&S
EX (2 CPs/1 Class
Case Study 7EN/IR – 1993 – 10 ClassesEX (1CP/ALL G&S) TR – 1999 (ALL CPs/3 G&S)TR –

Слайд 64Case Study 7 Cont’d
IRN 73689724A
EN – 1993 – Designations:

AT BG BX CH
Holder: Platform Ltd., USA
G&S: 03 09 14

16 18 20 24 25 27 28
Extension to BY – all G&S
Transfer to PlasticForm Co. USA + Change of Rep. - 1999
Designations - all
G&S – class 3 only
Transfer to Casandra & Co. Ltd. Spain – 2000
Designations – All
G&S – All
Renewal in 2003 – for CH only








Case Study 7 Cont’d IRN 73689724AEN – 1993 – Designations: AT BG BX CHHolder: Platform Ltd., USAG&S:

Слайд 65Case Study 7 Cont’d
PlasticForm Co. USA
EX – GB, GR, TR

+ LI as FF
GB – class 9, 14, 16
GR –

class 14, 14
TR – class 03 09 14 16 18 20 24 25 27 28
Renewal for BY, GB, GR, TR
PlasticForm Co. USA – Licensed for all designations and all G&S to Société de Création des Puits, SARL, France
Further Extension to FI, SE – Class 27 only

Case Study 7 Cont’dPlasticForm Co. USAEX – GB, GR, TR + LI as FFGB – class 9,

Слайд 66Case Study 8 - Ceasing of Effects
IR – February 2000

– OO/SE
Goods and Services: Class 35
Total Ceasing of Effects:

the basic application number XXXXXX has ceased to have effect as from 20.02.2004. This decision affects all goods and services

IR – September 2000 – OO/DE
Goods and Services : Classes 9, 16, 36, 38 and 42
Partial Ceasing of Effects: the basic registration number 399 77 318.5/38 has been renounced in respect of certain goods and services. The renunciation was declared on 14/01/2004
Classes 9, 16, 36, 38 and 42 are modified (limited)
Class 35 is cancelled
Case Study 8 - Ceasing of EffectsIR – February 2000 – OO/SEGoods and Services: Class 35 Total

Слайд 67Summary
The Madrid system
Advantages
Objectives
Roles/Procedures (IB, CP, OO)
Dependence/Independence
Renewal
Legal Background
Basic Application/Registration
Gazette


SummaryThe Madrid systemAdvantagesObjectivesRoles/Procedures (IB, CP, OO)Dependence/IndependenceRenewalLegal BackgroundBasic Application/RegistrationGazette

Обратная связь

Если не удалось найти и скачать доклад-презентацию, Вы можете заказать его на нашем сайте. Мы постараемся найти нужный Вам материал и отправим по электронной почте. Не стесняйтесь обращаться к нам, если у вас возникли вопросы или пожелания:

Email: Нажмите что бы посмотреть 

Что такое TheSlide.ru?

Это сайт презентации, докладов, проектов в PowerPoint. Здесь удобно  хранить и делиться своими презентациями с другими пользователями.


Для правообладателей

Яндекс.Метрика