Разделы презентаций


Managers as Decision Makers

Содержание

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Learning Outcomes Follow this Learning Outline as you read and study this chapter.6.1 The Decision-Making Process.Define decision.Describe the eight steps in the

Слайды и текст этой презентации

Слайд 1Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Managers

as Decision Makers
Chapter 6
Management


Stephen P. Robbins Mary Coulter


tenth

edition

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Managers  as  Decision MakersChapter 6Management Stephen

Слайд 2Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Learning

Outcomes Follow this Learning Outline as you read and study this

chapter.

6.1 The Decision-Making Process.
Define decision.
Describe the eight steps in the decision-making process.
6.2 Managers Making Decisions.
Discuss the assumptions of rational decision making.
Describe the concepts of bounded rationality, satisficing, and escalation of commitment.
Explain intuitive decision making.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Learning Outcomes Follow this Learning Outline as you

Слайд 3Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Learning

Outcomes
6.3 Types Of Decisions and Decision-Making

Conditions.
Explain the two types of problems and decisions.
Contrast the three decision making conditions.
Explain maximax, maximin, and minimax decision choice approaches.
6.4 Decision-Making Styles
Describe two decision-making styles.
Discuss the twelve decision-making biases.
Explain the managerial decision-making model.


Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Learning Outcomes6.3 Types Of Decisions and Decision-Making

Слайд 4Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Learning

Outcomes
6.5 Effective Decision Making In Today’s World.
Explain how managers can

make effective decisions in today’s world.
List the six characteristics of an effective decision making process.
List the five habits of highly reliable organizations.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Learning Outcomes6.5 Effective Decision Making In Today’s World.Explain

Слайд 5Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Decision

Making
Decision
Making a choice from two or more alternatives.
The Decision-Making Process
Identifying

a problem and decision criteria and allocating weights to the criteria.
Developing, analyzing, and selecting an alternative that can resolve the problem.
Implementing the selected alternative.
Evaluating the decision’s effectiveness.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Decision MakingDecisionMaking a choice from two or more

Слайд 6Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Exhibit

6–1 The Decision-Making Process

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Exhibit 6–1 The Decision-Making  Process

Слайд 7Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Step

1: Identifying the Problem
Problem
A discrepancy between an existing and desired

state of affairs.
Characteristics of Problems
A problem becomes a problem when a manager becomes aware of it.
There is pressure to solve the problem.
The manager must have the authority, information, or resources needed to solve the problem.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Step 1: Identifying the ProblemProblemA discrepancy between an

Слайд 8Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Step

2: Identifying Decision Criteria
Decision criteria are factors that are important

(relevant) to resolving the problem such as:
Costs that will be incurred (investments required)
Risks likely to be encountered (chance of failure)
Outcomes that are desired (growth of the firm)

Step 3: Allocating Weights to the Criteria

Decision criteria are not of equal importance:
Assigning a weight to each item places the items in the correct priority order of their importance in the decision-making process.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Step 2: Identifying Decision CriteriaDecision criteria are factors

Слайд 9Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Exhibit

6–2 Criteria and Weights for Computer Replacement Decision

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Exhibit 6–2	 Criteria and Weights for Computer Replacement

Слайд 10Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Step

4: Developing Alternatives
Identifying viable alternatives
Alternatives are listed (without evaluation) that

can resolve the problem.

Step 5: Analyzing Alternatives

Appraising each alternative’s strengths and weaknesses
An alternative’s appraisal is based on its ability to resolve the issues identified in steps 2 and 3.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Step 4: Developing AlternativesIdentifying viable alternativesAlternatives are listed

Слайд 11Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Exhibit

6–3 Assessed Values of Laptop Computers

Using Decision Criteria
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Exhibit 6–3  Assessed Values of Laptop

Слайд 12Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Step

6: Selecting an Alternative
Choosing the best alternative
The alternative with the

highest total weight is chosen.

Step 7: Implementing the Alternative

Putting the chosen alternative into action.
Conveying the decision to and gaining commitment from those who will carry out the decision.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Step 6: Selecting an AlternativeChoosing the best alternativeThe

Слайд 13Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Exhibit

6–4 Evaluation of Laptop Alternatives Against Weighted Criteria

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Exhibit 6–4	 Evaluation of Laptop Alternatives

Слайд 14Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Step

8: Evaluating the Decision’s Effectiveness
The soundness of the decision is

judged by its outcomes.
How effectively was the problem resolved by outcomes resulting from the chosen alternatives?
If the problem was not resolved, what went wrong?

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Step 8: Evaluating the Decision’s EffectivenessThe soundness of

Слайд 15Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Exhibit

6–5 Decisions in the Management Functions

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Exhibit 6–5	 Decisions in the Management

Слайд 16Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Making

Decisions
Rationality
Managers make consistent, value-maximizing choices with specified constraints.
Assumptions are that

decision makers:
Are perfectly rational, fully objective, and logical.
Have carefully defined the problem and identified all viable alternatives.
Have a clear and specific goal
Will select the alternative that maximizes outcomes in the organization’s interests rather than in their personal interests.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Making DecisionsRationalityManagers make consistent, value-maximizing choices with specified

Слайд 17Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Making

Decisions (cont’d)
Bounded Rationality
Managers make decisions rationally, but are limited (bounded)

by their ability to process information.
Assumptions are that decision makers:
Will not seek out or have knowledge of all alternatives
Will satisfice—choose the first alternative encountered that satisfactorily solves the problem—rather than maximize the outcome of their decision by considering all alternatives and choosing the best.
Influence on decision making
Escalation of commitment: an increased commitment to a previous decision despite evidence that it may have been wrong.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Making Decisions (cont’d)Bounded RationalityManagers make decisions rationally, but

Слайд 18Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
The

Role of Intuition

Intuitive decision making
Making decisions on the basis of

experience, feelings, and accumulated judgment.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–The Role of IntuitionIntuitive decision makingMaking decisions on

Слайд 19Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Exhibit

6–6 What Is Intuition?
Source: Based on L. A. Burke and M.

K. Miller, “Taking the Mystery Out of Intuitive Decision Making,” Academy of Management Executive, October 1999, pp. 91–99.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Exhibit 6–6	What Is Intuition?Source: Based on L. A.

Слайд 20Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Types

of Problems and Decisions
Structured Problems
Involve goals that are clear.
Are familiar

(have occurred before).
Are easily and completely defined—information about the problem is available and complete.
Programmed Decision
A repetitive decision that can be handled by a routine approach.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Types of Problems and DecisionsStructured ProblemsInvolve goals that

Слайд 21Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Types

of Programmed Decisions
Procedure
A series of interrelated steps that a manager

can use to respond (applying a policy) to a structured problem.
Rule
An explicit statement that limits what a manager or employee can or cannot do.
Policy
A general guideline for making a decision about a structured problem.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Types of Programmed DecisionsProcedureA series of interrelated steps

Слайд 22Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Policy,

Procedure, and Rule Examples
Policy
Accept all customer-returned merchandise.
Procedure
Follow all steps for

completing merchandise return documentation.
Rules
Managers must approve all refunds over $50.00.
No credit purchases are refunded for cash.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Policy, Procedure, and Rule ExamplesPolicyAccept all customer-returned merchandise.ProcedureFollow

Слайд 23Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Problems

and Decisions (cont’d)
Unstructured Problems
Problems that are new or unusual and

for which information is ambiguous or incomplete.
Problems that will require custom-made solutions.
Nonprogrammed Decisions
Decisions that are unique and nonrecurring.
Decisions that generate unique responses.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Problems and Decisions (cont’d)Unstructured ProblemsProblems that are new

Слайд 24Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Exhibit

6–7 Programmed Versus Nonprogrammed Decisions

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Exhibit 6–7  Programmed Versus Nonprogrammed Decisions

Слайд 25Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Decision-Making

Conditions
Certainty
A situation in which a manager can make an accurate

decision because the outcome of every alternative choice is known.
Risk
A situation in which the manager is able to estimate the likelihood (probability) of outcomes that result from the choice of particular alternatives.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Decision-Making ConditionsCertaintyA situation in which a manager can

Слайд 26Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Exhibit

6–8 Expected Value for Revenues from

the Addition of One Ski Lift

Expected Expected × Probability = Value of Each Event Revenues Alternative
Heavy snowfall $850,000 0.3 = $255,000
Normal snowfall 725,000 0.5 = 362,500
Light snowfall 350,000 0.2 = 70,000 $687,500

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Exhibit 6–8 	Expected Value for Revenues

Слайд 27Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Decision

Making Conditions
Uncertainty
Limited information prevents estimation of outcome probabilities for alternatives

associated with the problem and may force managers to rely on intuition, hunches, and “gut feelings.”
Maximax: the optimistic manager’s choice to maximize the maximum payoff
Maximin: the pessimistic manager’s choice to maximize the minimum payoff
Minimax: the manager’s choice to minimize maximum regret.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Decision Making ConditionsUncertaintyLimited information prevents estimation of outcome

Слайд 28Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Exhibit

6–9 Payoff Matrix

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Exhibit 6–9 Payoff Matrix

Слайд 29Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Exhibit

6–10 Regret Matrix

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Exhibit 6–10 Regret Matrix

Слайд 30Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Decision-Making

Styles
Linear thinking style
A person’s preference for using external data and

facts and processing this information through rational, logical thinking

Nonlinear thinking style
A person’s preference for internal sources of information and processing this information with internal insights, feelings, and hunches
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Decision-Making StylesLinear thinking styleA person’s preference for using

Слайд 31Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Exhibit

6–11 Common Decision-Making Errors and Biases

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Exhibit 6–11 Common Decision-Making Errors and Biases

Слайд 32Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Decision-Making

Biases and Errors
Heuristics
Using “rules of thumb” to simplify decision making.
Overconfidence

Bias
Holding unrealistically positive views of oneself and one’s performance.
Immediate Gratification Bias
Choosing alternatives that offer immediate rewards and that to avoid immediate costs.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Decision-Making Biases and ErrorsHeuristicsUsing “rules of thumb” to

Слайд 33Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Decision-Making

Biases and Errors
Anchoring Effect
Fixating on initial information and ignoring

subsequent information.
Selective Perception Bias
Selecting organizing and interpreting events based on the decision maker’s biased perceptions.
Confirmation Bias
Seeking out information that reaffirms past choices and discounting contradictory information.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Decision-Making Biases and Errors Anchoring EffectFixating on initial

Слайд 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Decision-Making

Biases and Errors (cont’d)
Framing Bias
Selecting and highlighting certain aspects of

a situation while ignoring other aspects.
Availability Bias
Losing decision making objectivity by focusing on the most recent events.
Representation Bias
Drawing analogies and seeing identical situations when none exist.
Randomness Bias
Creating unfounded meaning out of random events.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Decision-Making Biases and Errors (cont’d)Framing BiasSelecting and highlighting

Слайд 35Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Decision-Making

Biases and Errors
Sunk Costs Errors
Forgetting that current actions cannot

influence past events and relate only to future consequences.
Self-Serving Bias
Taking quick credit for successes and blaming outside factors for failures.
Hindsight Bias
Mistakenly believing that an event could have been predicted once the actual outcome is known (after-the-fact).
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Decision-Making Biases and Errors Sunk Costs ErrorsForgetting that

Слайд 36Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Exhibit

6–12 Overview of Managerial Decision Making

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Exhibit 6–12 Overview of Managerial Decision Making

Слайд 37Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Decision

Making for Today’s World
Guidelines for making effective decisions:
Understand cultural differences.
Know

when it’s time to call it quits.
Use an effective decision making process.
Habits of highly reliable organizations (HROs)
Are not tricked by their success.
Defer to the experts on the front line.
Let unexpected circumstances provide the solution.
Embrace complexity.
Anticipate, but also anticipate their limits.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Decision Making for Today’s WorldGuidelines for making effective

Слайд 38Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Characteristics

of an Effective Decision-Making Process
It focuses on what is important.
It

is logical and consistent.
It acknowledges both subjective and objective thinking and blends analytical with intuitive thinking.
It requires only as much information and analysis as is necessary to resolve a particular dilemma.
It encourages and guides the gathering of relevant information and informed opinion.
It is straightforward, reliable, easy to use, and flexible.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Characteristics of an Effective Decision-Making ProcessIt focuses on

Слайд 39Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
Terms

to Know
decision
Decision-making process
problem
decision criteria
rational decision making
bounded rationality
satisficing
escalation of commitment
intuitive decision

making
structured problems
programmed decision
procedure
rule

policy
unstructured problems
nonprogrammed decisions
certainty
risk
uncertainty
directive style
analytic style
conceptual style
behavioral style
heuristics
business performance management (BPM) software

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–Terms to KnowdecisionDecision-making processproblemdecision criteriarational decision makingbounded rationalitysatisficingescalation

Слайд 40Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

6–
All

rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,

stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall6–All rights reserved. No part of this publication

Обратная связь

Если не удалось найти и скачать доклад-презентацию, Вы можете заказать его на нашем сайте. Мы постараемся найти нужный Вам материал и отправим по электронной почте. Не стесняйтесь обращаться к нам, если у вас возникли вопросы или пожелания:

Email: Нажмите что бы посмотреть 

Что такое TheSlide.ru?

Это сайт презентации, докладов, проектов в PowerPoint. Здесь удобно  хранить и делиться своими презентациями с другими пользователями.


Для правообладателей

Яндекс.Метрика