Разделы презентаций


MODERN STRATEGIC ANALYSIS Theme 4. Strategy implementation. Strategy of Growth

Organisation’s life cycle Size of an organisationTimeEnteringGrowthMaturity DecliningNew development

Слайды и текст этой презентации

Слайд 1MODERN STRATEGIC ANALYSIS Theme 4. Strategy implementation. Strategy of Growth

Dr. Prof.

Aleksandr Kozlov
01/11/2016

MODERN STRATEGIC ANALYSIS Theme 4. Strategy implementation.  Strategy of GrowthDr. Prof. Aleksandr Kozlov01/11/2016

Слайд 2Organisation’s life cycle
Size of an organisation
Time
Entering
Growth
Maturity
Declining
New development

Organisation’s life cycle Size of an organisationTimeEnteringGrowthMaturity DecliningNew development

Слайд 3Phases of a company growth
Size of company
Large
Small
Age
Young
Mature
Crisis of leadership


Growth through creativity
Crisis of autonomy
Growth through direction
Growth through

delegation

Crisis of control

Growth through coordination

Crisis of mutual understanding

Evolution

revolution

Growth through collaboration

Phases of a company growthSize of companyLargeSmallAgeYoung MatureCrisis of leadership Growth through creativity Crisis of autonomy Growth

Слайд 4Phase 1. Development through creativity
The company’s founders are usually entrepreneurially

oriented, their energy is absorbed entirely in making and selling

products
Communication among employees is frequent and informal
Long hours of work are rewarded by modest salary
Control of activities comes from immediate marketplace feedback
Phase 1.  Development through creativityThe company’s founders are usually entrepreneurially oriented, their energy is absorbed entirely

Слайд 5Leadership crisis
As a company grows larger production range require knowledge

about efficiencies of manufacturing
Increased number of employees can not be

managed through informal communication
New accounting procedures are needed
New employees are not so motivated as “pioneers”
Leadership crisisAs a company grows larger production range require knowledge about efficiencies of manufacturingIncreased number of employees

Слайд 6Phase 2. Development through direction
A functional organisational structure is introduced

to separate production and marketing
Accounting system for inventory, production and

purchasing are introduced
Budget and performance standards are adapted
Communication becomes more formal
Phase 2.  Development through directionA functional organisational structure is introduced to separate production and marketingAccounting system

Слайд 7Autonomy crisis
Low-level managers are restricted by centralised hierarchy
They feel torn

between following procedures and taking initiative of their own
Necessity to

coordinate decisions with bosses slow down a decision-making process
Autonomy crisisLow-level managers are restricted by centralised hierarchyThey feel torn between following procedures and taking initiative of

Слайд 8Phase 3. Development through delegation
Much greater responsibility is given

to managers
Profit centers and bonuses are used to motivate managers
The

top executives at headquarters restrain themselves to managing by exceptions, based on periodic reports from the field
Phase 3.  Development through delegation Much greater responsibility is given to managersProfit centers and bonuses are

Слайд 9Phase 3. Decentralisation and centralisation
Decentralisation is the process of

transferring and assigning of decision-making authority to the lower level

of hierarchy
Centralisation is the process of transferring and assigning of decision-making authority to the higher level of hierarchy
Phase 3.  Decentralisation and centralisation Decentralisation is the process of transferring and assigning of decision-making authority

Слайд 10Phase 3. Three types of decentralisation
Deconcentration. Weakest form of decentralisation,

proposing redistribution of decision-making authority to the lower levels of

the same centralised and totally controlled structure
Delegation. A more extensive form of decentralisation, proposing the transfer of decision-making authority to the lower levels not wholly controlled
Devolution. The transfer of decision-making authority to autonomous units and groups
Phase 3.  Three types of decentralisationDeconcentration. Weakest form of decentralisation, proposing redistribution of decision-making authority to

Слайд 11Control crisis
The top executives sense that they are losing control

over a highly diversified field operations
Autonomous field managers prefer to

run their units without coordination with the rest of organisation
Control crisisThe top executives sense that they are losing control over a highly diversified field operationsAutonomous field

Слайд 12Phase 4. Development through coordination
Units are merged into product

groups
Capital expenditures are very carefully weighted
Each product group is

treated as an investment center and evaluated on ROI basis
Certain technical functions such as data processing personnel training centralised at headquarter
Phase 4.  Development through coordination Units are merged into product groupsCapital expenditures are very carefully weighted

Слайд 13Micro-case study “Delta-M” or “Who is responsible for what?”
“Delta-M”

is company set up by four former researchers in 2003.

The main product is specialised clothing for workers, operating in different types of aggressive environment: firemen, worker at oil processing plants etc. They started from two small rooms, the first for manufacturing of fabric and other one for sewing with five sewing machines. Five first years were very successful. The annual sales growth was close to 30 %, the owners were working hard like real team, supporting each other, keeping all management functions in their hands. In the year of 2008 staff of “Delta-M” achieved 70 employees, working in two workshops and designing bureau. In the year of 2007 happened unpleasant surprise: growth of sales in the second half of this year was close to zero. Team of owners applied to consulting company for advice.
During the first meeting after rituals of mutual presenting the consultant asked owners: “Who is responsible for sales?”. And was shocked by given answer, better to say, answers. It was like chorus : “It’s me!”. “What about designing?” – the same result .
Micro-case study “Delta-M” or  “Who is responsible for what?” “Delta-M” is company set up by four

Слайд 14Micro-case study “Delta-M” or “Who is responsible for what?”

Questions.
Identify the

stage of growth of “Delta-M”
Suggest the real reason for low growth of sales in the second half of the year of 2007.
Propose the actions to be done by owners of “Delta-M”
Micro-case study “Delta-M” or  “Who is responsible for what?”

Обратная связь

Если не удалось найти и скачать доклад-презентацию, Вы можете заказать его на нашем сайте. Мы постараемся найти нужный Вам материал и отправим по электронной почте. Не стесняйтесь обращаться к нам, если у вас возникли вопросы или пожелания:

Email: Нажмите что бы посмотреть 

Что такое TheSlide.ru?

Это сайт презентации, докладов, проектов в PowerPoint. Здесь удобно  хранить и делиться своими презентациями с другими пользователями.


Для правообладателей

Яндекс.Метрика