The theme of the given course work is

work is
COMPLEX
TRANSFORMATION

main notions of complex transformation and show the using them

on the practice
The main objectives of our course paper are:
to make theoretical research upon this theme
to reveal the main types of complex transformation
To analyze their influence
to study the problems of translating of complex translation
to make practical research upon this theme
to work with сomplex transformations in the works
to make a conclusion

CONTENTS Introduction Chapter 1: Complex Transformation in translation 1.1) Ways of Achieving Equivalence 1.2)

Complex transformations 1.3) Types of complex transformations Chapter 2: Practical analysis 2.1 A translation analysis of the work of Arthur Koestler “Burning Abyss’’ Conclusion Bibliography Appendix

transformations

complex (lexical and grammatical) transformations

Grammar transformations are morphological or syntactical

changes in translated units. They are subdivided into the following types:

Grammar substitution

Word order change

Sentence partitioning

Sentence integration

.Grammar compensation

Complex transformation types
lexical (semantiс) level
grammatical level
Explicatory translation
Reduction (omission,

implicitation)

Integral transformation

Antonymic translation

Metonymical translation

Complex compensation

conservation in translation , means:
1) the characteristics of the era

;

2) national and social specificity ;

3) creative individuality of the author;

4) a particular genre ;

5) the unity of form and content ;

6 ) Compliance with the ratio of parts and the whole.

compensation
Antonymic translation
Integral transformation
Reduction (omission, implicitation)
Metonymical translation

work of the
Arthur Koestler “Burning Abyss”
In this paper

we presented a Kazakh translation of text and we gave a general characterization. We also conducted an analysis of the difficulties encountered in the translation process and justify the adequacy of the use of certain transformations, depending on the specifics of the source material.

-Еркек өлім аузында болды.
-In this example, we observe the

reception of a functional replacement against the background of another technique - the semantic development. In Kazakh it is impossible to use a direct translation of the English expression in this situation, therefore it is rethought: a pound of finger pressure –жақын– қарсаңында-өлім аузында(in this context)

example of a functional replacement.
In kazakh there is no direct

equivalent to the selected combination, but there is an equivalent in stylistic terms equivalent, used in translation. Functionally they are equal, because Mean the same thing - «кішкене ұйықтау» and are used in both languages in a conversational style

are funny.
...білесің бе, егер жоғалып қалсаң, сыбыс сенімен әзілдеседі
First,

there was a substitution of the subordinate sentence of the mode of action (how it is ...) for the circumstances of the time (егер…), secondly, the whole transformation was applied on the background of the semantic development: it is impossible to say «қызық сыбыс(немесе күлкілі)» So you have to think about what that means. As a result, it turns out - when a person gets lost, he becomes frightened, and he starts to take different sounds and rustles for wild animals, etc. Therefore, it turns out that«сыбыс ойнайды <адаммен > жаман ойындар».

this example, we meet a separate method of functional replacement:

the English figurative expression is translated by an adequate figurative expression of the Kazakh language.

the analysis of examples taken from the work " Burning

Abyss " shows that the most commonly used technique is concretization (14%), functional replacement (17%), semantic development (19%) metonymy translation (1%). Least often used were: translation commentary (2%) and explication (2%).