Разделы презентаций


Organizational Structure and Design

Содержание

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Learning Outcomes Follow this Learning Outline as you read and study this chapter.9.1 Defining Organizational StructureDiscuss the traditional and contemporary views of

Слайды и текст этой презентации

Слайд 1Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Organizational

Structure and Design
Chapter 9
Management


Stephen P. Robbins Mary Coulter


tenth

edition

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Organizational Structure and DesignChapter 9Management Stephen P. Robbins

Слайд 2Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Learning

Outcomes Follow this Learning Outline as you read and study this

chapter.

9.1 Defining Organizational Structure
Discuss the traditional and contemporary views of work specialization, chain of command, and span of control.
Describe each of the five forms of departmentalization.
Differentiate, authority, responsibility, and unity of command.
Explain how centralization – decentralization and formalization are used in organizational design.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Learning Outcomes Follow this Learning Outline as you

Слайд 3Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Learning

Outcomes
9.2 Mechanistic and Organic Structures
Contrast mechanistic and organic organizations.
Explain the

contingency factors that affect organizational design.
9.3 Common Organizational Designs
Contrast the three traditional organizational designs.
Describe the contemporary organizational designs.
Discuss the organizational design challenges facing managers today.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Learning Outcomes9.2 Mechanistic and Organic StructuresContrast mechanistic and

Слайд 4Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Designing

Organizational Structure
Organizing
Arranging and structuring work to accomplish an organization’s goals.
Organizational

Structure
The formal arrangement of jobs within an organization.
Organizational Design
A process involving decisions about six key elements:
Work specialization
Departmentalization
Chain of command
Span of control
Centralization and decentralization
Formalization
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Designing Organizational StructureOrganizingArranging and structuring work to accomplish

Слайд 5Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Exhibit

9–1 Purposes of Organizing
Divides work to be done into specific jobs

and departments.
Assigns tasks and responsibilities associated with individual jobs.
Coordinates diverse organizational tasks.
Clusters jobs into units.
Establishes relationships among individuals, groups, and departments.
Establishes formal lines of authority.
Allocates and deploys organizational resources.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Exhibit 9–1	Purposes of OrganizingDivides work to be done

Слайд 6Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Organizational

Structure
Work Specialization
The degree to which tasks in the organization are

divided into separate jobs with each step completed by a different person.
Overspecialization can result in human diseconomies from boredom, fatigue, stress, poor quality, increased absenteeism, and higher turnover.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Organizational StructureWork SpecializationThe degree to which tasks in

Слайд 7Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Departmentalization

by Type
Functional
Grouping jobs by functions performed
Product
Grouping jobs by product

line
Geographical
Grouping jobs on the basis of territory or geography

Process
Grouping jobs on the basis of product or customer flow
Customer
Grouping jobs by type of customer and needs

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Departmentalization by TypeFunctional Grouping jobs by functions performedProductGrouping

Слайд 8Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Exhibit

9–2 The Five Common Forms of Departmentalization

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Exhibit 9–2	The Five Common Forms of Departmentalization

Слайд 9Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Exhibit

9–2 (cont’d) Geographical Departmentalization

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Exhibit 9–2 (cont’d) Geographical Departmentalization

Слайд 10Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Exhibit

9–2 (cont’d) Product Departmentalization

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Exhibit 9–2 (cont’d) Product Departmentalization

Слайд 11Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Exhibit

9–2 (cont’d) Process Departmentalization
+ More efficient flow of work activities
– Can only

be used with certain types of products
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Exhibit 9–2 (cont’d) Process Departmentalization+	More efficient flow of

Слайд 12Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Exhibit

9–2 (cont’d) Customer Departmentalization
+ Customers’ needs and problems can be

met by specialists
- Duplication of functions
- Limited view of organizational goals
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Exhibit 9–2 (cont’d) Customer Departmentalization+ Customers’ needs and

Слайд 13Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Organizational

Structure (cont’d)
Chain of Command
The continuous line of authority that extends

from upper levels of an organization to the lowest levels of the organization and clarifies who reports to whom.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Organizational Structure (cont’d)Chain of CommandThe continuous line of

Слайд 14Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Organizational

Structure (cont’d)
Authority
The rights inherent in a managerial position to tell

people what to do and to expect them to do it.
Responsibility
The obligation or expectation to perform.
Unity of Command
The concept that a person should have one boss and should report only to that person.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Organizational Structure (cont’d)AuthorityThe rights inherent in a managerial

Слайд 15Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Organizational

Structure (cont’d)
Span of Control
The number of employees who can be

effectively and efficiently supervised by a manager.
Width of span is affected by:
Skills and abilities of the manager
Employee characteristics
Characteristics of the work being done
Similarity of tasks
Complexity of tasks
Physical proximity of subordinates
Standardization of tasks
Sophistication of the organization’s information system
Strength of the organization’s culture
Preferred style of the manager
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Organizational Structure (cont’d)Span of ControlThe number of employees

Слайд 16Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Exhibit

9–3 Contrasting Spans of Control

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Exhibit 9–3	Contrasting Spans of Control

Слайд 17Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Organizational

Structure (cont’d)
Centralization
The degree to which decision making is concentrated at

upper levels in the organization.
Organizations in which top managers make all the decisions and lower-level employees simply carry out those orders.
Decentralization
Organizations in which decision making is pushed down to the managers who are closest to the action.
Employee Empowerment
Increasing the decision-making authority (power) of employees.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Organizational Structure (cont’d)CentralizationThe degree to which decision making

Слайд 18Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Exhibit

9–4 Factors that Influence the Amount of Centralization

and Decentralization

More Centralization
Environment is stable.
Lower-level managers are not as capable or experienced at making decisions as upper-level managers.
Lower-level managers do not want to have a say in decisions.
Decisions are relatively minor.
Organization is facing a crisis or the risk of company failure.
Company is large.
Effective implementation of company strategies depends on managers retaining say over what happens.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Exhibit 9–4	Factors that Influence the Amount of

Слайд 19Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Exhibit

9–4 (cont’d) Factors that Influence the Amount

of Centralization and Decentralization

More Decentralization
Environment is complex, uncertain.
Lower-level managers are capable and experienced at making decisions.
Lower-level managers want a voice in decisions.
Decisions are significant.
Corporate culture is open to allowing managers to have a say in what happens.
Company is geographically dispersed.
Effective implementation of company strategies depends on managers having involvement and flexibility to make decisions.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Exhibit 9–4 (cont’d) Factors that Influence the Amount

Слайд 20Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Organizational

Structure (cont’d)
Formalization
The degree to which jobs within the organization are

standardized and the extent to which employee behavior is guided by rules and procedures.
Highly formalized jobs offer little discretion over what is to be done.
Low formalization means fewer constraints on how employees do their work.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Organizational Structure (cont’d)FormalizationThe degree to which jobs within

Слайд 21Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Exhibit

9–5 Mechanistic Versus Organic Organization
• High specialization
• Rigid departmentalization
• Clear chain

of command
• Narrow spans of control
• Centralization
• High formalization

• Cross-functional teams
• Cross-hierarchical teams
• Free flow of information
• Wide spans of control
• Decentralization
• Low formalization

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Exhibit 9–5	Mechanistic Versus Organic Organization• High specialization• Rigid

Слайд 22Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Contingency

Factors
Structural decisions are influenced by:
Overall strategy of the organization
Organizational structure

follows strategy.
Size of the organization
Firms change from organic to mechanistic organizations as they grow in size.
Technology use by the organization
Firms adapt their structure to the technology they use.
Degree of environmental uncertainty
Dynamic environments require organic structures; mechanistic structures need stable environments.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Contingency FactorsStructural decisions are influenced by:Overall strategy of

Слайд 23Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Contingency

Factors (cont’d)
Strategy Frameworks:

Innovation
Pursuing competitive advantage through meaningful and unique innovations

favors an organic structuring.

Cost minimization
Focusing on tightly controlling costs requires a mechanistic structure for the organization.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Contingency Factors (cont’d)Strategy Frameworks:InnovationPursuing competitive advantage through meaningful

Слайд 24Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Contingency

Factors (cont’d)
Strategy and Structure
Achievement of strategic goals is facilitated by

changes in organizational structure that accommodate and support change.
Size and Structure
As an organization grows larger, its structure tends to change from organic to mechanistic with increased specialization, departmentalization, centralization, and rules and regulations.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Contingency Factors (cont’d)Strategy and StructureAchievement of strategic goals

Слайд 25Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Contingency

Factors (cont’d)
Technology and Structure
Organizations adapt their structures to their technology.
Woodward’s

classification of firms based on the complexity of the technology employed:
Unit production of single units or small batches
Mass production of large batches of output
Process production in continuous process of outputs
Routine technology = mechanistic organizations
Non-routine technology = organic organizations
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Contingency Factors (cont’d)Technology and StructureOrganizations adapt their structures

Слайд 26Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Exhibit

9–6 Woodward’s Findings on Technology, Structure, and Effectiveness

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Exhibit 9–6	Woodward’s Findings on Technology,

Слайд 27Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Contingency

Factors (cont’d)
Environmental Uncertainty and Structure
Mechanistic organizational structures tend to be

most effective in stable and simple environments.
The flexibility of organic organizational structures is better suited for dynamic and complex environments.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Contingency Factors (cont’d)Environmental Uncertainty and StructureMechanistic organizational structures

Слайд 28Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Common

Organizational Designs
Traditional Designs
Simple structure
Low departmentalization, wide spans of control, centralized

authority, little formalization
Functional structure
Departmentalization by function
Operations, finance, marketing, human resources, and product research and development
Divisional structure
Composed of separate business units or divisions with limited autonomy under the coordination and control the parent corporation.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Common Organizational DesignsTraditional DesignsSimple structureLow departmentalization, wide spans

Слайд 29Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Exhibit

9–7 Strengths and Weaknesses of Traditional Organizational Designs

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Exhibit 9–7	Strengths and Weaknesses of Traditional

Слайд 30Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Exhibit

9–8 Contemporary Organizational Designs

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Exhibit 9–8	Contemporary Organizational Designs

Слайд 31Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Exhibit

9–8 (cont’d ) Contemporary Organizational

Designs
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Exhibit 9–8 (cont’d	) Contemporary Organizational

Слайд 32Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–

Organizational Designs (cont’d)
Contemporary Organizational Designs
Team structures
The entire organization is made

up of work groups or self-managed teams of empowered employees.
Matrix and project structures
Specialists from different functional departments are assigned to work on projects led by project managers.
Matrix and project participants have two managers.
In project structures, employees work continuously on projects; moving on to another project as each project is completed.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9– Organizational Designs (cont’d)Contemporary Organizational DesignsTeam structuresThe entire

Слайд 33Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Organizational

Designs (cont’d)
Contemporary Organizational Designs (cont’d)
Boundaryless Organization
An flexible and unstructured organizational

design that is intended to break down external barriers between the organization and its customers and suppliers.
Removes internal (horizontal) boundaries:
Eliminates the chain of command
Has limitless spans of control
Uses empowered teams rather than departments
Eliminates external boundaries:
Uses virtual, network, and modular organizational structures to get closer to stakeholders.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Organizational Designs (cont’d)Contemporary Organizational Designs (cont’d)Boundaryless OrganizationAn flexible

Слайд 34Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Removing

External Boundaries
Virtual Organization
An organization that consists of a small core

of full-time employees and that temporarily hires specialists to work on opportunities that arise.
Network Organization
A small core organization that outsources its major business functions (e.g., manufacturing) in order to concentrate on what it does best.
Modular Organization
A manufacturing organization that uses outside suppliers to provide product components for its final assembly operations.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Removing External BoundariesVirtual OrganizationAn organization that consists of

Слайд 35Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Today’s

Organizational Design Challenges
Keeping Employees Connected
Widely dispersed and mobile employees
Building a

Learning Organization
Managing Global Structural Issues
Cultural implications of design elements
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Today’s Organizational Design ChallengesKeeping Employees ConnectedWidely dispersed and

Слайд 36Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Organizational

Designs (cont’d)
The Learning Organization
An organization that has developed the capacity

to continuously learn, adapt, and change through the practice of knowledge management by employees.
Characteristics of a learning organization:
An open team-based organization design that empowers employees
Extensive and open information sharing
Leadership that provides a shared vision of the organization’s future.
A strong culture of shared values, trust, openness, and a sense of community.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Organizational Designs (cont’d)The Learning OrganizationAn organization that has

Слайд 37Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
Terms

to Know
organizing
organizational structure
organizational chart
organizational design
work specialization
departmentalization
cross-functional teams
chain of command
authority
responsibility
unity of

command
span of control
centralization
decentralization
employee empowerment
formalization

mechanistic organization
organic organization
unit production
mass production
process production
simple structure
functional structure
divisional structure
team structure
matrix structure
project structure
boundaryless organization
virtual organization
network organization
learning organization

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–Terms to Knoworganizingorganizational structureorganizational chartorganizational designwork specializationdepartmentalizationcross-functional teamschain

Слайд 38Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9–
All

rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,

stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall9–All rights reserved. No part of this publication

Обратная связь

Если не удалось найти и скачать доклад-презентацию, Вы можете заказать его на нашем сайте. Мы постараемся найти нужный Вам материал и отправим по электронной почте. Не стесняйтесь обращаться к нам, если у вас возникли вопросы или пожелания:

Email: Нажмите что бы посмотреть 

Что такое TheSlide.ru?

Это сайт презентации, докладов, проектов в PowerPoint. Здесь удобно  хранить и делиться своими презентациями с другими пользователями.


Для правообладателей

Яндекс.Метрика